Creating meaningful K-map taxonomies
by Volker Weber
Among knowledge management professionals, a fine-tuned, easy to understand taxonomy is just about the most beautiful thing in the world. After all, here is a visual representation of that most elusive yet critical concept, what your organization actually knows. With a well-constructed, meaningful taxonomy, users can quickly find the right people and information they need to achieve their goals. It's equivalent to having instant expertise at your fingertips, ready to answer questions you may have at any time. Sounds wonderful, doesn't it?
Of course, in the real world, it's historically been very difficult to construct a useful taxonomy of corporate information, especially in larger organizations. Indeed, before the advent of computers, it was all but impossible, particularly for major companies where employees came and went and new technical documents were constantly added to the corporate store of knowledge. So in most situations, taxonomies tended to either be superficial and general, or constantly out of date -- often both.
Lotus Discovery Server helps change all that. Now you have a state-of-the-art tool that can keep track of your documents as well as your user's skills, regularly checking for updates and additions. More importantly, Discovery Server uses complex mathematical metrics to analyze the content of your your documents and the experience of your employees, find affinities between them, and place them into categories. These categories comprise a computer-generated taxonomy, or in terms of Discovery Server vocabulary, a K-map.
But no computer program, however sophisticated, can precisely predict exactly how a particular organization may want to structure its content. So to build a truly meaningful, easy to use K-map taxonomy, humans and computers must work together. This requires some time, patience, and creative thinking (on the part of the humans anyway). But if done correctly, the results are more than worth it.
This article offers advice on building useful, robust K-map taxonomies. It presents things to consider when deciding which type of taxonomy scheme works best for your organization and who should be involved in the process. We'll prepare you for all the major steps involved in planning and creating a taxonomy.
Comments
Recent comments
Christian Tillmanns on Meeeeeeeeeeep at 08:41
Wolfgang Siebeck on Nokia Belle is available at 05:58
Ingo Martinz on Meeeeeeeeeeep at 22:32
Axel Koerv on Meeeeeeeeeeep at 21:57
Roland Dressler on Outlook to Notes converter: from PST to NSF at 11:50
Karl Heindel on Outlook to Notes converter: from PST to NSF at 10:30
Jerry Preissler on LibreOffice vs Apache OpenOffice at 13:47
Mariano Kamp on How to commit at 09:41
Bernd Vellguth on Outlook to Notes converter: from PST to NSF at 02:05
Thilo Hamberger on Outlook to Notes converter: from PST to NSF at 16:40
Jens Bruntt on Free PlayBook for your Android app submission at 11:47
Karl Heindel on Outlook to Notes converter: from PST to NSF at 20:26
Roland Dressler on Outlook to Notes converter: from PST to NSF at 15:12
Stephan H. Wissel on heise online: IBM plant Stellenabbau in Deutschland at 08:38
Jan Lauer on heise online: IBM plant Stellenabbau in Deutschland at 04:13
Juergen Heinrich on Balance at 03:29
Jörg Hermann on Girls On Longboards at 02:42
Stephan H. Wissel on heise online: IBM plant Stellenabbau in Deutschland at 23:21
Joerg Michael on heise online: IBM plant Stellenabbau in Deutschland at 21:01
Ben Poole on Outlook to Notes converter: from PST to NSF at 19:46
David Hablewitz on BlackBerry Business Cloud Services with Microsoft Office 365 at 16:44
Patrick Picard on RIM tries to be social. Falls flat on face. at 16:00
Volker Weber on Outlook to Notes converter: from PST to NSF at 10:29
Richard Hogan on Outlook to Notes converter: from PST to NSF at 10:26
Joachim Haydecker on Girls On Longboards at 08:26
Click here to subscribe
Post a comment