Validate your feeds
by Volker Weber
It looks like the Domino folks are learning new tricks. RSS feeds this time. Gentlemen, please validate your feeds. Against both the validators from Dave Winer at UserLand.com as well as Mark Pilgrim and Sam Ruby at Archive.org.
This is not an option. It does not matter if your design breaks a few browsers, but a feed should never break an aggregator. It has to validate.
Comments
Being in the middle of a project to build a Domino-based aggregator, I agree -- but I also believe that practical aggregators have to be written to be as tolerant as possible of the variety of non-conformant feeds that our out there. My own feed fails the Archive.org validator -- which doesn't like the date tag (and I should surely fix that) -- but my aggregator code handles it (and many other non-conforming feeds) anyhow. I'm actually more concerned about the fact that even sytactically validated feeds have differing semantics which can be more difficult to deal with. For example, the best primary key to use for an item might be either the link or guid elements, or the rdf:about attribute, but you can't really count on any one of them being held constant for the same article over multiple feeds. There are quite a few other annoyances and complications that I've run into, and I've only been working on this part-time for about a week -- with about 75 feeds coming in from Domino and non-Domino sources. I've actually found that the feeds coming from some of the very prominent non-Domino bloggers are pretty useless, whereas most of the Domino-based feeds at least give me the information I need.
-rich
That is very true. There a lots of variations of the spec and different ways to express things. Most bloggers will simple go with the default templates that came with their software. Unfortunately the early MovableType templates were nonconforming (as is the current default template for the index pages).
Validating is the bare minimum requirement. As a user I would be really happy if the publishers would strip their tag soup from their feeds. I don't need (and don't want) their font tags.
Steve C and I have been working on fixing the problem with my feed. Fix should be in soon...
And this fix is just related to embedding of images by rich text - otherwise the RSS validates no problem.
Post a comment
Recent comments
Nick Daisley on Meeeeeeeeeeep at 15:42
Nick Daisley on Meeeeeeeeeeep at 15:34
Christian Tillmanns on Meeeeeeeeeeep at 08:41
Wolfgang Siebeck on Nokia Belle is available at 05:58
Ingo Martinz on Meeeeeeeeeeep at 22:32
Axel Koerv on Meeeeeeeeeeep at 21:57
Roland Dressler on Outlook to Notes converter: from PST to NSF at 11:50
Karl Heindel on Outlook to Notes converter: from PST to NSF at 10:30
Jerry Preissler on LibreOffice vs Apache OpenOffice at 13:47
Mariano Kamp on How to commit at 09:41
Bernd Vellguth on Outlook to Notes converter: from PST to NSF at 02:05
Thilo Hamberger on Outlook to Notes converter: from PST to NSF at 16:40
Jens Bruntt on Free PlayBook for your Android app submission at 11:47
Karl Heindel on Outlook to Notes converter: from PST to NSF at 20:26
Roland Dressler on Outlook to Notes converter: from PST to NSF at 15:12
Stephan H. Wissel on heise online: IBM plant Stellenabbau in Deutschland at 08:38
Jan Lauer on heise online: IBM plant Stellenabbau in Deutschland at 04:13
Juergen Heinrich on Balance at 03:29
Jörg Hermann on Girls On Longboards at 02:42
Stephan H. Wissel on heise online: IBM plant Stellenabbau in Deutschland at 23:21
Joerg Michael on heise online: IBM plant Stellenabbau in Deutschland at 21:01
Ben Poole on Outlook to Notes converter: from PST to NSF at 19:46
David Hablewitz on BlackBerry Business Cloud Services with Microsoft Office 365 at 16:44
Patrick Picard on RIM tries to be social. Falls flat on face. at 16:00
Volker Weber on Outlook to Notes converter: from PST to NSF at 10:29
Click here to subscribe
