Groove: Ten Good Reasons Not To Buy
by Volker Weber
Robin Good:
Groove is a unique, powerful, almost supernatural collaboration tool, for which I have spent many words of praise, as it does represent a great breakthrough in terms of integration of facilities and vision for what may be the road of killer apps of the near future. Wonder why it is so hard to make Groove beyond an historical technology milestone and into mainstream use?
Here are some answers to ponder upon.
Let me add a few more points:
11) Windows only. It does not run on all of my computers, or those of my peers.
12) Lives on an island. It does not talk to anything else. Not to any instant messaging or conference application.
13) No search. This looks like WOM (write only memory). You dump stuff in there and if you can't remember where you put it, it's gone.
14) No useful export. Again, write only memory. You dump stuff in there and there is no way to reuse it somewhere else. Binary XML export? Cool.
15) No print. Ooops. You can print some things. The easier ones. No calendar however.
16) No sync for names or dates. These things live in Clyde and whatever talks to this device. Groove does not.
17) Hen and egg dilemma. How useful is a telephone if you are the only person who has one?
18) No uninstall. If you install 3rd party tools, there is no way to wipe them from the system.
19) No uninstall, reloaded. Ever tried to uninstall Groove itself and then looked at the registry afterwards?
20) Did I mention it does not run on Lucy? Yes, I did. :-)
Comments
21) Groove treats "files" and "web links" as separate things. You can't have a consolidated list of folders into which both "files" and "web links" can be pasted. The folders have to be duplicated.
22) collaboration is about finding the easiest and simplest way of working together. The compromise is usually finding the lowest common denominator, especially concerning the tools. If one of the collaborators can't use Groove (company policy, firewall, no Windows, or simply not a big enough computer), all collaborators will work with something else, ie email etc.
(This argument is partially included in some of the previous ones)
23) Collaboration results often need to be published. Why is it so tideous to publish Groove output on a website? (Hugh Pyle started some tool, but it never got finalised) The web services & .NET stuff is something for specialists, not end users, not small businesses.
24) Groove has increasingly become a tool for large corporations and their security maniacs. This is stopping bottom up evolution (or viral spreading...).
Post a comment
Recent comments
Alex Boschmans
on Nice try at 13:35
Volker Weber
on From my inbox at 12:21
Stephan H. Wissel
on From my inbox at 12:00
Karsten Lehmann
on Nice try at 01:17
Oswald Prucker
on Nice try at 00:54
Jim Boling
on Nice try at 23:24
Albert Dandl
on Nice try at 20:12
Karsten Lehmann
on Nice try at 19:18
Riza Baltazar
on Color coordination for web sites at 19:10
Sean Cull
on From my inbox at 19:00
Armin Roth
on Nice try at 18:02
Bart Severein
on From my inbox at 16:52
Hubert Stettner
on Why is Nokia such a complete failure? at 14:59
Ralf Stellmacher
on Overheard in New York at 12:47
Chris Frei
on Holy moly at 09:03
Ben Poole
on Why is Nokia such a complete failure? at 08:50
Dirk Steins
on Holy moly at 08:11
simon carter
on Why is Nokia such a complete failure? at 08:06
Ingo Seifert
on Holy moly at 05:50
Moritz Schroeder
on Why is Nokia such a complete failure? at 04:22
Mika Heinonen
on Why is Nokia such a complete failure? at 02:26
Andy Mell
on Holy moly at 00:54
Volker Weber
on Why is Nokia such a complete failure? at 00:23
Oswald Prucker
on Holy moly at 00:02
Yves Luther
on Why is Nokia such a complete failure? at 23:33
Click here to subscribe
