Why Wikipedia sucks. Big time.
by Volker Weber
Wikipedia generates noise, not knowledge. Previous encyclopedias were well-researched and contained precise information that could be trusted to be correct. Wikipedia, on the other hand, contains a large amount of errors, omissions and superfluous trivia.
Basically, what is happening here is the building of a parallel World Wide Web inside the wikipedia.org domain and calling it an "encyclopedia", which is a total perversity. Just making it searchable and giving it an encyclopedia-like structure doesn't make its content any less fluffy, error-ridden and amateurish than any other website.
Comments
Wikipedia is an important experiment in diverse collaboration, and represents really interesting thought in that space. I don't think its potential for use is being touched yet.
On the other hand, as an authoritative public source of validated information, it is as you describe.
I see your point. Right at the moment most articles in Wikipedia are not authoritative information.
But Wikipedia is a selflearning, selfregulating system. Thus it gets better day by day. Good authors will respect more authoritative knowledge, while rubbish will be deleted if every author maintains his articles.
in the following you will see the setup of diverse "epistemic communities" caring for the validity of information! So in my eyes wikipedia is becoming the vastest authoritative encyclopedia ever.
Isn't that a bit of a flamer, an unfair generalisation?
Yes, Wikipedia is not perfect, it works on a "selfcorrective" principle of a large group. (You could probably do some nice swarm analysis on Wikipedia contributions and contributors.) So by definition the content is not casted in stone and may be incorrect. So what, overall the quality of wikipedia is more than ok.
What do you know of the traditional publishers of such encyclopedias, how they work, who writes what and especially who decides what information will NOT be included? One simply assumes that as institutions they are trustworthy. Humans err and so do institutions.
With this reasoning one could also rant against the web itself with it's billions of web sites. Many sites contain some kind of knowledge, but also "a large amount of errors, omissions and superfluous trivia." And via google and other search engines they are also used as an encyclopedia. Content only has to be a little bit consistent and believable to be considered as fact.
In contrast to this wikipedia has some kind of self control, errors (should) get corrected. On web sites authored by only one person this generally/often doesn't happen at all.
"Previous encyclopedias were well-researched and contained precise information that could be trusted to be correct" = sure, the sun circles around the earth, yes yes :-))
Recent comments
Kai Nehm
on Hootsuite for Android is really pretty at 17:39
Jeff Gilfelt
on Hootsuite for Android is really pretty at 17:30
Mariano Kamp
on Hootsuite for Android is really pretty at 17:00
Mathias Ziolo
on Paris in 26 Gigapixels at 16:55
Timm Caspari
on Paris in 26 Gigapixels at 16:28
Oswald Prucker
on Paris in 26 Gigapixels at 15:57
Oswald Prucker
on Paris in 26 Gigapixels at 15:54
Sascha Westphal
on How to Setup Your Own Web Proxy Server For Free with Google App Engine at 19:19
Moritz Schroeder
on The Single Sign On at 13:43
Nils Halvorsen
on How to Setup Your Own Web Proxy Server For Free with Google App Engine at 22:35
Mitch Cohen
on How to Setup Your Own Web Proxy Server For Free with Google App Engine at 22:12
Nick Daisley
on The Single Sign On at 20:54
Volker Weber
on The Single Sign On at 14:17
Tobias Hauser
on The Single Sign On at 13:12
Martin Böhm
on As if Palm needed more problems at 13:03
Ralf Stellmacher
on Zitat des Tages at 11:40
Philipp Sury
on The Single Sign On at 11:33
Jan-Piet Mens
on The Single Sign On at 10:48
Chris Frei
on The Single Sign On at 09:55
Volker Weber
on iPhone OS 3.1.3 brings back Internet Tethering to unlocked iPhones at 00:18
Steven Payne
on iPhone OS 3.1.3 brings back Internet Tethering to unlocked iPhones at 00:15
Robert Dahlem
on Zitat des Tages at 22:22
Volker Weber
on Steve Jobs at the 2010 Oscars at 22:21
Richard Kaufmann
on Who wants a free Sonos? Better: who wants four? at 21:23
Jan Schierkolk
on Steve Jobs at the 2010 Oscars at 18:47
Click here to subscribe
