Brothers in arms
by Volker Weber
Thomas Gumz is an engineer. An engineer builds stuff. Just because he can. Like a Domino Administrator running in a browser which looks and acts the same as a native application. An application written in DHTML and Javascript with an asynchronous data link to the server. Web 2.0 people call this Ajax. IBM calls it WebAdmin.nsf.
Damien Katz is an engineer. An engineer builds stuff. Just because he can. Like a stand-alone document store, accessible via XML REST. Ad-hoc and schema-free with a flat address space. Distributed, featuring robust, incremental replication with bi-directional conflict detection and resolution. Query-able and index-able, featuring a table oriented reporting engine with a simplified formula query language. Damien calls it CouchDb.
Thomas and Damien used to work for Iris Associates, a subsidiary of Lotus. Iris is no more. It's now an IBM lab, it is still building Notes, and Thomas is still working there. Not Damien though. He is working on his database engine.
Engineers build stuff. Just because they can. Sometimes they need managerial oversight. Otherwise they won't finish stuff until it's perfect. Which it never is. But sometimes they also look after each other. Like Thomas looking after Damien.
Today Thomas gives Damien CouchDb.com. And CouchDb.net. And CouchDb.org. Damien does not know this yet. OK, now he does. ;-)
Tags: couchdb damien+katz
Comments
Who says that world is a bad place, when things like this happen? The world is good.
I'm keeping Damien's blog in my feedreader and I'm very interested in how CouchDB turns out to be... I'm not thrilled about the formula language :-) but I'm thrilled with the feature set. Go, Damien!
What's wrong with formula language? Chortle. This is a very cool story: good work Thomas, and keep up the good fight Damien!
I wonder if Thomas would have done this if Germany had lost :-D Yeah I know he would, he's a good guy.
And if you want to hear Damien talk about CouchDb with another engineer Julian Robichaux and a manager type (me as Thomas would say) then be sure to check out this podcast:
http://takingnotes.openntf.org/blogs/takingnotes.nsf/dx/taking-notes-episode-23-06.07.06.htm
Very nice.. very good.
Its nice to even be associated with people like this.
Formula language? Don't get me started. I have developed allergies against @, ; and too many brackets.
I think the syntax of a language should be something elegant. (And no, I don't intend to start a language war). I have worked with Ruby for the past year. Apart from Smalltalk (which I adored) this is the most elegant language (to read and to write) I know.
(I've been around the block, language wise: Basic, Pascal, Modula-2, APL, C, C++, Java, Smalltalk, Perl, Python, Ruby, ELisp, Notes Forumla Language, LotusScript, JavaScript - so I think I know what I'm talking about)
Notes formula language is sometimes elegant (list functions) but in general just a PITA to write and maintain.
I admit I haven't looked at the proposed CouchDB language - reading that it is based on the Notes formula language was a turn off for me.
Jens-Christian, I was just pulling your leg. I hear you ;o) When I encounter line-upon-line of nested formula language, I shudder in despair.
However, when I encounter three or four lines of judiciously-placed @formula -- especially ND6.x formula -- this pleases me. It has a zen-like quality, and the best code does the job amazingly well.
Ben, yep - there are some good formulas. I have the same feeling when I read good Ruby code (and I have just begun to write "so-so" Ruby code, so I know that I can strive for much more)
Hi Jens, Fabric is not intended to be a general purpose language, but rather primarily as query language. It is list based like Notes Formula language, but I think you'll find the syntax much nicer.
Your most welcome, Damien. And vowe is a good mother.
Post a comment
Recent comments
Alex Boschmans
on Nice try at 13:35
Volker Weber
on From my inbox at 12:21
Stephan H. Wissel
on From my inbox at 12:00
Karsten Lehmann
on Nice try at 01:17
Oswald Prucker
on Nice try at 00:54
Jim Boling
on Nice try at 23:24
Albert Dandl
on Nice try at 20:12
Karsten Lehmann
on Nice try at 19:18
Riza Baltazar
on Color coordination for web sites at 19:10
Sean Cull
on From my inbox at 19:00
Armin Roth
on Nice try at 18:02
Bart Severein
on From my inbox at 16:52
Hubert Stettner
on Why is Nokia such a complete failure? at 14:59
Ralf Stellmacher
on Overheard in New York at 12:47
Chris Frei
on Holy moly at 09:03
Ben Poole
on Why is Nokia such a complete failure? at 08:50
Dirk Steins
on Holy moly at 08:11
simon carter
on Why is Nokia such a complete failure? at 08:06
Ingo Seifert
on Holy moly at 05:50
Moritz Schroeder
on Why is Nokia such a complete failure? at 04:22
Mika Heinonen
on Why is Nokia such a complete failure? at 02:26
Andy Mell
on Holy moly at 00:54
Volker Weber
on Why is Nokia such a complete failure? at 00:23
Oswald Prucker
on Holy moly at 00:02
Yves Luther
on Why is Nokia such a complete failure? at 23:33
Click here to subscribe
