Effectiveness of the war on terror

by Ragnar Schierholz

The Transactional Records Access Clearinghous (TRAC) at Syracuse University has analyzed justice departments' statistics to assess the effectiveness of the "war on terror". The results are now published in a TRAC Report.

In his blog, Bruce Schneier highlights some of the ironic results. You want examples? The median sentence in terror-related trials range from 28 to 20 days, depending on how long after 9/11 the trial took place. U.S. prosecuters rejected slightly more than 9 out of 10 cases of international terrorism brought to them. Several more can be found in the original report.

[via Schneier on Security]

Comments

I am not sure if I would call these results "ironic". Rather I think they are a good and healthy sign for prosecutors still being independent from government's will, which is far more than many would expect.

Haiko, seen from that point of view, you make perfect sense. I think it's somewhat ironic because it largely contradicts the official administation position that the measures are oh so effective. Successes such as the finding of the plans and the arrest of the terrorists in London are put into perspective by these statistics.

Call me a conspiracist, but my worry is that the U.S. government would use this information to put pressure on prosecutors and judges to garner more trials and convictions. We know they don't care about anything like justice, and they are certainly good at twisting data to make their agenda and themselves appear better.

Katie Bondurant, 2006-09-06 14:45

I'm not surprised at all, because it's pretty obvious that the Bush administration is not relying on the normal prosecutors and courts, except in the most trivial cases.

I think (unfortunately) that the correct interpretation of this is that when investigations lead to dead ends but some minor matters were discovered without violating any rules of evidence gathering and without violating due process rights, then the cases are turned over to the prosecutors and courts. In those cases, the defendants get the benefits of all the rights the US system gives to accused criminals, and they are lightly punished. Those are the only cases that show in the statistics, but the are not the only cases.

When investigations lead to dead ends and some minor matters were discovered but violations of the rules make that evidence inadmissable in US courts, then the cases are turned over to the immigration department and the accused people are given hearings according to the much lower standards of due process that apply, and then they are deported. And when investigations are leading to real evidence against real terrorist threats, those cases are never being handled by prosecutors and courts, and they're not being handled by immigration. They are being dealt with by other agencies, with no due process.

So I guess this story comes right in time to prove your point, Richard: Bush admits to CIA secret prisons.

Post a comment











Shall I remember this for you?




Use your full name and a working email address. Unless you want your comment to be removed. No kidding.



Recent comments

Martin Hipfinger on I have seen faster at 07:06
Thomas Gumz on How to save half a gig of disk space in a couple of seconds at 03:11
Sebastian Herp on Amazing photos - all taken with a mobile phone at 01:02
Armin Roth on From my inbox at 01:01
Volker Weber on How to save half a gig of disk space in a couple of seconds at 00:18
Mark Elgar on How to save half a gig of disk space in a couple of seconds at 00:04
Volker Weber on How to save half a gig of disk space in a couple of seconds at 23:52
Ed Brill on How to save half a gig of disk space in a couple of seconds at 23:39
Volker Weber on Google Gears beta for Safari at 22:36
Ben Poole on Google Gears beta for Safari at 22:20
Alexander Kluge on How to save half a gig of disk space in a couple of seconds at 21:44
Volker Weber on How to save half a gig of disk space in a couple of seconds at 21:24
Martin Christian Kautz on How to save half a gig of disk space in a couple of seconds at 21:20
Claurice Jackson on How to save half a gig of disk space in a couple of seconds at 20:41
Andy Brunner on How to save half a gig of disk space in a couple of seconds at 19:56
Norlailawati Zain on What's the Notes market share really like? at 19:26
Richard Kaufmann on Department of Homeland Security launches Electronic System for Travel Authorization at 18:35
Lennard Timm on Password not appropriate at 14:37
Adalbert Duda on Password not appropriate at 14:03
Roger Schwarz on Synchronizing iPhone with ... Lotus Notes at 13:57
Ben Rose on Put a Porsche in your driveway at 13:31
Ben Rose on Put a Porsche in your driveway at 13:22
Ben Rose on Zones at 13:10
Nick Daisley on Put a Porsche in your driveway at 13:03
Ben Rose on Put a Porsche in your driveway at 12:50

Ceci n'est pas un blog

vowe.net is a personal website published by Volker Weber a.k.a. vowe. I am an author, consultant and systems architect based in Darmstadt, Germany.

rss Click here to subscribe

Hello

About me
Contact
Publications
Certificates
Frequently asked questions

Twitter Updates

More >

Poll

Can you bring a camera phone to work?

Getting poll results. Please wait...

Local time is 07:48

visitors.gif
140 visitors online

News

Other sources of news, imported into my own format to make them more accessible:

Heise Online
Schlagzeilen
Weather

Archives

As most of my articles roll off the front page rather quickly, I am making an archive of previous posts available here. You can also use the handy search box at the top of the page if you are looking for something particular.

Last 30 days
More archives

Got the T-shirt?

Got the T-shirt?
Are you buying from the US?

Systems Architecture

This site runs on an Apache web server on top of the Linux operating system. The content is managed with MovableType which is implemented in Perl. Last but not least the HTML code your browser sees is put together with PHP.

© 1992-2008 Volker Weber.
All Rights Reserved.

Impressum