Joel: Now would be a good time to buy stock in Internet flamewars
by Volker Weber
Imagine that you went to Mars, where you discovered that the beings who live there don’t have the portable music player. They’re still using boom boxes.
You realize this is a huge business opportunity and start selling portable MP3 players (except on Mars they’re called Qxyzrhjjjjukltks) and compatible headphones.
Follow Joel on his journey to explain requirements for backwards compatibility. He is a brilliant writer who only lacks the ability to make his point with a short story. So pour yourself a fresh cup of coffee and get cracking.
Comments
How true that is! He writes beautiful and interesting stuff, but it's difficult to find excuses to take the necessary half-day off to read through his latest piece, follow up all the links and do it proper justice.
Mark Pilgrim's take on Joel is also fun to read...
Mark is the idealist. ;-)
true, but without his comment it would be only half the fun. And despite all, both are usually a worthwhile read.
Mark is the idealist. ;-)That’s one word for him… ;o)
So Joel Spolsky wants us to believe that the special behaviour of IE6/7 is caused by a legitimate interpretation of very complicated and vague standards. The IE team tried its best but unfortunatly web pages don't look the same in IE as in other browsers. That's naive. Microsoft deliberately violated standards like CSS or DOM by implementing them only partially or simply ignoring the spec. Who really believes that this impressive list of bugs and errors is just the fault of a bad standard, when almost every other vendor is able to comply with it?
It's fair to say that *some* of the rendering oddities in any browser are due to complicated and vague standards. HTML was intended to define semantic structure around text for generic browsers, not to build crazy, visually rich web applications. Furthermore, new versions have to support old bad behavior from previous versions, at least for a while. This is not an excuse, but a partial explanation. The issue is more and less complicated than Joel made it out to be. Here's my take:
http://www.robbyslaughter.com/blog/?2008-03-21
Post a comment
Recent comments
Armin Auth
on A developer asks: What should the Notes desktop really look like? at 17:28
Stefan Tilkov
on Schweizer Amtsschimmel at 17:03
Volker Weber
on Schweizer Amtsschimmel at 15:45
Christian Tillmanns
on Schweizer Amtsschimmel at 15:39
Ralf Stellmacher
on Schweizer Amtsschimmel at 15:34
Roland Leißl
on OpenOffice.org 3.0 Beta available at 12:28
Sascha Reissner
on OpenOffice.org 3.0 Beta available at 11:27
Volker Weber
on Crackberry 9000 first look at 11:12
Ben Rose
on Crackberry 9000 first look at 08:11
Andrew Pollack
on A developer asks: What should the Notes desktop really look like? at 02:37
Roland Leißl
on A developer asks: What should the Notes desktop really look like? at 01:59
Roland Leißl
on OpenOffice.org 3.0 Beta available at 01:45
Ben Poole
on A developer asks: What should the Notes desktop really look like? at 00:10
Thomas Einwaller
on Crackberry 9000 first look at 23:03
Volker Weber
on A developer asks: What should the Notes desktop really look like? at 22:45
Martin Hiegl
on A developer asks: What should the Notes desktop really look like? at 22:37
Jan Tietze
on Crackberry 9000 first look at 20:25
Markus Dierker
on Crackberry 9000 first look at 19:48
Alexander Kluge
on Crackberry 9000 first look at 19:41
Heiko Müller
on On heavy rotation at 18:51
Stuart McIntyre
on OpenOffice.org 3.0 Beta available at 18:23
Wolfgang Schwerber
on On heavy rotation at 17:13
Jan-Piet Mens
on OpenOffice.org 3.0 Beta available at 16:06
Sascha Reissner
on OpenOffice.org 3.0 Beta available at 15:55
Timo Stamm
on OpenOffice.org 3.0 Beta available at 15:42
Click here to subscribe
