Introduced by Microsoft as a key element of Microsoft Windows Phone strategy, Metro is now being positioned as the aesthetic standard just shy of an absolute requirement for Windows Phone and tablet-optimized apps for Windows 8 and Windows RT.
What no one’s asking, though, is this: “does Metro actually work?”
In my opinion: No.
I don't agree. It works for me. Well, read on ...
For me it is not really working. Yes, it looks nice, but I agree with the article that there is a certain amount of hide-and-seek that you have to play with the buttons, which is quite annoying. I tried it out myself on a tablet PC and I also watched a fellow student struggle for a while with the Metro UI.
But for me the real problem starts when using Windows 8 as a desktop OS, without touch controls. Because Microsoft threw out the Windows 7 start menu in favor of the Metro start screen, there is a disruption whenever you want to access something from the start screen. Each time the whole screen changes. I find this the most annoying thing about the new UI and I really hope that there will be good launcher apps available when Windows 8 ships. Otherwise I will hold on to Windows 7 on my desktop PC as long as I can. I saw a funny video on Youtube where one guy tries out Windows 8, starts the Explorer from the start screen, which brings him to the desktop, then closes the Explorer window and then is stuck on the desktop because he can't figure out on his own how to get back to the start screen. I think that says it all.
I found that article quite surprising. It seems the author is heavily invested in WinRT/Metro development. Upcoming book, giving training courses, running a programmer community,...
Now, why would somebody spend so much time on something he considers utterly broken by concept?
For me, my biggest question is: how is that the future on the desktop is an 8 color palette, 2D GUI with 3D "window" animations? It is all text, no icons, black/dark background with white/light text. Its too sad to restrict a GUI to 2D elements, with a minimal color palette and no graphics.
The problem with Metro is that Microsoft will use it in every Windows App, and all 3rd party developers will do the same. Remember the Ribbon in Office? Now everybody use it, but at least it is better than an all metro interface with a mouse/keyboard.
Metro is fine, for and only for WP and Windows Tablets.
I bet, there was the same discussion when Xerox, ehrm I mean, Apple introduced a graphical interface and a mouse back in the 80s.
Except the graphical interface allowed us to put more information on the screen, not less.
Hubert Stettner on Let's raise the bar for Android recommendations at 00:30
Volker Weber on Traveling ultralight at 13:20
Theo Heselmans on Traveling ultralight at 13:19
Armin Grewe on Google Arts & Culture at 11:48
Amy Blumenfield on Listen to this! at 03:28
Manfred Wiktorin on Qualitätsjournalismus at 01:39
Volker Weber on Here we go again at 21:54
Armin Grewe on Here we go again at 21:31
Joseph O'Laughlin on Here we go again at 20:07
Marc Henkel on Here we go again at 19:41
Heiko Müller on Google Arts & Culture at 15:15
Daniel Haferkorn on Qualitätsjournalismus at 14:38
Andy Brunner on Google Arts & Culture at 13:50
Volker Weber on Stuff that works :: Olloclip Active Lens at 13:18
Bernd Schuster on Stuff that works :: Olloclip Active Lens at 13:14
Bernd Hofmann on Qualitätsjournalismus at 13:03
Markus Philippi on Qualitätsjournalismus at 10:37
Volker Weber on Headset recommendation at 10:03
Timo Zimmermann on Headset recommendation at 08:32
Christian Rosner on Headset recommendation at 20:12
Ingo Seifert on Listen to this! at 18:27
Dan Sickles on Sonos 101 at 16:01
Volker Weber on Sonos 101 at 14:17
Friedrich Holstein on Sonos 101 at 14:08
thorsten ebers on Sonos 101 at 12:14