One of the metrics of the Notes/Domino business that my team has been tracking this year is "reinstatements," or customer purchases that bring lapsed licenses back on active maintenance contracts.
For the first three quarters of 2012, that number is a surprising 1,151 enterprises.
I am missing one driver from the explanation: Traveler. You can't get Traveler if you are not on maintenance. And you need Traveler if you want to support those iPhones that are replacing BlackBerrys left and right. Not to forget the iPad, which sold 100 million since it became available in 2010.
The gist of the post is also a bit misleading. These are customers who did not pay for maintenance and now do. This is not about migrations from competing offerings.
The really interesting number, that IBM is not going to give you, is how many seats IBM has on maintenance. My gut feeling is about 20 to 25% of lifetime licenses sold.
Nothing misleading about "reinstatements," or customer purchases that bring lapsed licenses back on active maintenance contracts.
Read the comments to your post. You just wrote a full book and should really know how to write one thing, that can easily be misunderstood as something else. :-)
I really donīt see how Edīs Post can be misleading. may google translate could help .......
The title of the post "Ed Brill - 1,151 enterprises return to Notes/Domino YTD in 2012" would seem to imply that these organisations were running on competing products and have now gone back to Notes/Domino!
I find this a funny discussion.
One thing I know for sure is that Ed didn't mean this definition: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Returning (although some customer trying to migrate, might love to do so)
I see only one comment that refers to swings. The way I read it is that he meant this as additional nuance to the nr. of reinstatements.
Like yourself Volker, I too find those numbers really interesting. Just make sure to add 1,151 enterprises to your gut feeling :-)
I meant "returning" as in "coming back". Not sure how it gets interpreted as a competitive win.
That's why I said 'a bit'. Went from Notes somewhere else and then came back. That is what I first understood, and then realized that I misunderstood.
They might have gone nowhere but off of an active maintenance contract.
Of course, I understand this now.
Jochen Kattoll on Madeleine Albright wins at Twitter at 15:59
Craig Wiseman on Microsoft makes a Lock Screen :: For Android at 15:09
Haiko Hebig on HERE on Android at 12:56
Bernd Schuster on Microsoft makes a Lock Screen :: For Android at 11:29
Dieter Baum on Microsoft makes a Lock Screen :: For Android at 09:40
Frank Quednau on PhotoMath at 22:48
Marc Henkel on HERE on Android at 21:49
Markus Jabs on PhotoMath at 21:33
Harald Gaerttner on PhotoMath at 16:18
Ingo Seifert on PhotoMath at 16:06
Craig Wiseman on Galaxy Note 4 keeps growing on me at 15:41
Adrian Woizik on PhotoMath at 15:40
Volker Weber on Galaxy Note 4 keeps growing on me at 15:26
Craig Wiseman on Galaxy Note 4 keeps growing on me at 15:07
Richard Kaufmann on HERE on Android at 09:46
John Keys on MixRadio on Sonos at 09:26
Volker Weber on Samsung Galaxy Note 4 has landed at 23:31
Hubert Stettner on Apple’s Jonathan Ive describes his design process at 23:10
Paul Mooney on Apple’s Jonathan Ive describes his design process at 22:46
Ian Bradbury on Samsung Galaxy Note 4 has landed at 21:46
Olaf Boerner on Das DNUG Büro informiert at 16:17
Matthias Lorz on Apple’s Jonathan Ive describes his design process at 11:54
Mirko Zellner on Das DNUG Büro informiert at 11:33
Stefan Lattermann on Das DNUG Büro informiert at 11:16
Ulrich Willer on Samsung Galaxy Note 4 has landed at 10:53