One of the metrics of the Notes/Domino business that my team has been tracking this year is "reinstatements," or customer purchases that bring lapsed licenses back on active maintenance contracts.
For the first three quarters of 2012, that number is a surprising 1,151 enterprises.
I am missing one driver from the explanation: Traveler. You can't get Traveler if you are not on maintenance. And you need Traveler if you want to support those iPhones that are replacing BlackBerrys left and right. Not to forget the iPad, which sold 100 million since it became available in 2010.
The gist of the post is also a bit misleading. These are customers who did not pay for maintenance and now do. This is not about migrations from competing offerings.
The really interesting number, that IBM is not going to give you, is how many seats IBM has on maintenance. My gut feeling is about 20 to 25% of lifetime licenses sold.
Nothing misleading about "reinstatements," or customer purchases that bring lapsed licenses back on active maintenance contracts.
Read the comments to your post. You just wrote a full book and should really know how to write one thing, that can easily be misunderstood as something else. :-)
I really don´t see how Ed´s Post can be misleading. may google translate could help .......
The title of the post "Ed Brill - 1,151 enterprises return to Notes/Domino YTD in 2012" would seem to imply that these organisations were running on competing products and have now gone back to Notes/Domino!
I find this a funny discussion.
One thing I know for sure is that Ed didn't mean this definition: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Returning (although some customer trying to migrate, might love to do so)
I see only one comment that refers to swings. The way I read it is that he meant this as additional nuance to the nr. of reinstatements.
Like yourself Volker, I too find those numbers really interesting. Just make sure to add 1,151 enterprises to your gut feeling :-)
I meant "returning" as in "coming back". Not sure how it gets interpreted as a competitive win.
That's why I said 'a bit'. Went from Notes somewhere else and then came back. That is what I first understood, and then realized that I misunderstood.
They might have gone nowhere but off of an active maintenance contract.
Of course, I understand this now.
Matt White on Microsoft won't fix 'Sleep of Death' bug at 22:36
Volker Weber on 365 days at 20:12
Fridolin Koch on 365 days at 18:48
Rob McDonagh on Microsoft won't fix 'Sleep of Death' bug at 18:45
Ralf ter Veer on Microsoft won't fix 'Sleep of Death' bug at 18:28
Amy Blumenfield on Microsoft won't fix 'Sleep of Death' bug at 18:16
Wolfram Votteler on Sonos + Dyson + Surface = zufrieden at 17:20
Volker Weber on 365 days at 16:02
Dirk Haunschild on 365 days at 14:53
Volker Weber on 365 days at 14:41
Sven Bühler on 365 days at 14:37
Volker Weber on Sonos + Dyson + Surface = zufrieden at 14:02
Volker Weber on Microsoft won't fix 'Sleep of Death' bug at 13:16
Thomas Cloer on Microsoft won't fix 'Sleep of Death' bug at 12:56
Erik Ferrari on 365 days at 11:45
Dirk Steins on 365 days at 11:25
John Keys on Sonos + Dyson + Surface = zufrieden at 10:55
Federico Hernandez on 365 days at 21:30
John Keys on Long Ambients1: Calm. Sleep. at 20:56
Hagen Bauer on 365 days at 19:17
Hubert Stettner on Long Ambients1: Calm. Sleep. at 18:09
Volker Weber on 365 days at 15:02
Markus Schäfer on 365 days at 14:45
Volker Weber on 365 days at 13:36
Benjamin Bock on 365 days at 12:47