Comparing the PureViews

by Volker Weber

I started making some photos with both the Lumia 920 and the 808 PureView. Nokia uses the PureView brand as a moniker for "good camera". 920 and the 808 have nothing much in common but the Nokia and the PureView brands. While the 808 uses a huge sensor with 41 megapixels to provide for digital lossless zoom and enhanced image processing through pixel binning, the 920 has an optical image stabilization which lets you capture more light by keeping the shutter open for a longer time.

The two cameras cater to different needs. The 808 is a full fledged camera that lets you control lots of setting and also has a Xenon flash, the 920 tries to automate everything. Just point and shoot. So that's what I am going to do. Tweak the 808 a bit (8MP, Superfine, Vivid), and let the 920 do it all by itself. Since the 920 may be smarter than I am, this could be a huge advantage. If you click through to the Skydrive folder, you can also look at the data.

More >

Comments

Vielen Dank für die Fotos!
Bei einem 1:1 Crop scheint das 808 deutlich rauschärmer (was aufgrund des Pixel-Oversamplings auch keine Überraschung ist). Dafür sind die Farben des 920 poppiger (nicht unbedingt richtiger), was heutzutage notwendig zu sein scheint, damit ein Foto als gut empfunden wird. Und bei wenig Licht scheint das 920 durch die Stabilisierung.

Hubert Stettner, 2012-11-02 08:43

The 920 image stabilisator seems to work very well. This is amazing. And this is also important, most cameras manage to take somewhat OK images in bright daylight. At night there is a clear distinction: works or blurred.

Re. the colors: Nice Doppler effect browsing the sdrv ;)

808 colors are impressive. Unobstrusive, realistic. 920 much too warm.
By comparison, in the 808-world Darmstadt appears to be a north german town ;)


Tobias Hauser, 2012-11-04 11:01

Recent comments

Thom Marteebaq on Withings at 17:39
Daniel Tietze on Withings at 15:22
Martin Forisch on Withings at 12:23
Martin Forisch on I bet you did not see this coming from BlackBerry at 12:14
Martin Forisch on LDC is now in the Asbestos removal business at 11:02
Ralph Hammann on I bet you did not see this coming from BlackBerry at 16:18
Ingo Seifert on My UP24 died today at 14:23
David Guillaume on My UP24 died today at 00:17
Volker Weber on My UP24 died today at 00:10
David Guillaume on My UP24 died today at 00:02
Mariano Kamp on My UP24 died today at 22:44
Volker Weber on My UP24 died today at 21:20
Moritz Ehlenz on My UP24 died today at 20:47
Ralph Hammann on BlackBerry Porsche Design P'9983 at 12:50
Volker Weber on I bet you did not see this coming from BlackBerry at 07:51
Stephan Bohr on I bet you did not see this coming from BlackBerry at 07:13
Lino Helms on iPhone 6 NFC chip is restricted to Apple Pay at 15:29
Franz Mattes on Mittagsspaziergang at 06:52
Eric Hancock on iPhone 6 NFC chip is restricted to Apple Pay at 04:32
Ingo Seifert on iPhone 6 NFC chip is restricted to Apple Pay at 00:24
Ingo Seifert on iPhone 6 NFC chip is restricted to Apple Pay at 23:38
Andrew Magerman on iPhone 6 NFC chip is restricted to Apple Pay at 16:34
Volker Weber on iPhone 6 NFC chip is restricted to Apple Pay at 15:38
Craig Wiseman on iPhone 6 NFC chip is restricted to Apple Pay at 15:28
Eric Bredtmann on iPhone 6 NFC chip is restricted to Apple Pay at 14:17

Ceci n'est pas un blog

vowe.net is a personal website published by Volker Weber a.k.a. vowe. I am an author, consultant and systems architect based in Darmstadt, Germany.

rss Click here to subscribe

Hello

About me
Contact
Publications
Certificates
Amazon Wish List
Frequently Asked Questions
Follow @vowe on Twitter

Local time is 02:01

visitors.gif

Tip jar

Archives

As most of my articles roll off the front page rather quickly, I am making an archive of previous posts available here. You can also use the handy search box at the top of the page if you are looking for something particular.

Last 30 days
More archives

Mobile tag for this page

© 1992-2014 Volker Weber.
All Rights Reserved.

Impressum