Facebook really wants your phone number. And they want a messaging service like WhatsApp that uses the phone number as an identifier. When Facebook has both, they know your real social graph. Not the list of 'friends' you have accumulated.
Simple solution: Facebook does not need your phone number.
Now they're just missing your phone number, vowe - http://www.tagesschau.de/wirtschaft/facebook462.html :-)
I could not help but notice.
Puh, das war gerade noch rechtzeitig; SMS und JOYN wollten sich gerade die Klippe runterstürzen.
Still the price was crazy. WhatsApp in its current form is not a substitute for Facebook and thus not a real threat. A takeover by e.g. Google and change in model could have brought that, but not today. Thus 19 billion for maybe 350 million in yearly revenue is nothing but crazy. It shows a loss of sensible relations which can happen if you become a multibillionaire that young I guess.
@Martin: it was USD 40 / user. The same amount Microsoft paid 1999 (?) for Hotmail
I think it was a sensible purchase. For a company that will be rated on growth and not user base, facebook has to do things like this. younger generations are not as invested in FB as they are Snapchat, Whatsapp and smaller apps. Whatsapp had the product FB wanted, plus the user demographic they will need for growth, and billed accordingly. Expensive, but needed.
Akquisition is fairly reasonable. Who knows if FB isn't an abandoned place in five years? Think AOL, Compuserve, Geocities, MySpace... And as far as I know there's no real money involved. At least not that much. Stocks...
@Volker, as an old fart, I immediately kicked WhatsApp off my phone. As I did with IG. Not based on rational reasoning, just an emotional decision. But hey, isn't the future all about emotions & gamification? :-)
Ich glaube, ich bin noch älter. Oder eben nicht. ;-)
Ja, Unterschied zwischen geistigem und körperlichem Alter.
Ich mag einfach die Idee, daß ich das letzte Puzzle-Stück bin, dass FB vom Erreichen der Singularität trennt. :-)
So wichtig bin ich nicht. :-)
Stephan, that could make sense if the user brought e.g. 40$ revenue per year via ads. However to pay 40x the revenue a user brings is still not a sound business decision to me.
Martin, the "no real money" thing is a fair point. However even if FB were abandoned in five years the only way to save themselves with WA would be to change the business model to increase the return per user. For now I believe their statements that they won't but instead operate it as an independent division/company.
Sascha Langfus on Meine erste Fahrt mit Uber at 19:55
Volker Weber on Belkin QODE Thin Keyboard at 16:25
Ralf ter Veer on Belkin QODE Thin Keyboard at 16:16
Hubert Stettner on Lumia Cyan rollout continues at 16:11
Volker Weber on Lumia Cyan rollout continues at 15:34
Adam Gartenberg on Tweet of the day at 15:16
Stuart McIntyre on Lumia Cyan rollout continues at 15:09
Volker Weber on Meine erste Fahrt mit Uber at 11:37
Christian Henseler on Meine erste Fahrt mit Uber at 11:31
Volker Weber on Tweet of the day at 11:18
Ludwig Deruyck on Tweet of the day at 10:50
Frank Quednau on Tweet of the day at 10:42
Stephan H. Wissel on An update on IBM Mail Next at 09:50
Chris frei on Meine erste Fahrt mit Uber at 05:54
Federico Hernandez on Meine erste Fahrt mit Uber at 05:26
Ingo Seifert on Meine erste Fahrt mit Uber at 02:51
Nils Michael Becker on Meine erste Fahrt mit Uber at 23:14
Martina Kautz on Meine erste Fahrt mit Uber at 22:22
Bodo Menke on Meine erste Fahrt mit Uber at 22:19
Michael Schermann on Meine erste Fahrt mit Uber at 21:50
Roland Dressler on Meine erste Fahrt mit Uber at 21:45
Volker Weber on Meine erste Fahrt mit Uber at 21:30
Christian Henseler on Meine erste Fahrt mit Uber at 21:07
Hubert Michl on United Carry-On Luggage at 16:24
Ralf M Petter on An update on IBM Mail Next at 09:47