How I make Twitter work for me

by Volker Weber

ZZ5BCAA605

I am running a tight Twitter ship with following only 120something accounts. Lots of bots, lots of smart people. It takes some efforts to keep my stream clean, so here are some of my ground rules.

  1. Some people write interesting tweets, but they also retweet lots of other tweets, for purposes that may serve them, but not me. Simple remedy: go to their profile, hit the gear button, disable retweets.
  2. In order to make money, Twitter uses native advertising. Ads that look like native tweets, followed by a 'sponsored by tagline'. If the ad is from an account I follow, it was a waste of money. If I do not follow the particular account, I block and mark it as a spam account.
  3. Now Twitter has started to fill my feed with tweets they find interesting but I don't. For each of those tweets I block the account the tweet was originating from.

As Twitter dials up their abuse, one day I will stop using it. Like I did with Google+ and Facebook. How could this be solved? Freemium. Let me pay for a clean experience. As it stands today, the business works like prostitution. You get fcuked, somebody else gets the money.

Comments

I am not sure if rule #3 would work for me. By this I would block accounts that might be very relevant for me, based on one (uninteresting) tweet. And as far as I understand the new mechanics it would be very likely that i block potentially relevant accounts, because these unsoliticed tweets in my timeline are based on retweets of my peer group.

Not that I like the whole idea of twitter messing with my timeline, but this blocking strategy seems not to address the underlying problem and only locks me out of ever more (potentially relevant) accounts. And I assume Twitter will always find new accounts to push to my timeline, regardless of how many I block.

Andreas Eldrich, 2014-08-22 15:27

Twitter had a tab for interesting stuff for a while. Since nobody seemed to care, they force-feed you now.

Volker Weber, 2014-08-22 15:36

How much would you pay for twitter?

Tobias Müller, 2014-08-23 12:14

How much would you pay for twitter?

Tobias Müller, 2014-08-23 12:15

My fair share. Revenue divided by active users.

Volker Weber, 2014-08-23 19:04

I'm using a third-party-client. An so I didn't see any of the above mentioned issues.

Karl Heindel, 2014-08-24 09:21

I have been waiting for that remark. Can you see your future?

Volker Weber, 2014-08-24 09:30

That sounds like a lot of work. You must get a good use out of it.

Matthias Welling, 2014-08-25 10:29

Yes, I do get good use of it. And no, it isn't a lot of work. Blocking somebody as a spammer takes about a second.

Somehow Twitter went from opt-in to opt-out.

Volker Weber, 2014-08-25 10:39

Ich habe insbesondere Tipp Nr. 2 mal ausprobiert gerade, weil mir Werbung eines Sportartikelherstellers in die Timeline gespült wird. Account geblockt und als SPAM markiert, aber der Tweet wird mir immer weiter angezeigt. Da scheint Twitter also schon vorgebeugt zu haben.

Nils Michael Becker, 2014-08-25 10:59

When I get annoyed enough, I do the following in the case of #2:
I reply to the sponsored tweet with my own ad (i.e. a political statement, like "vote pirate!" or something), so everyone who is clicking on the original ad will get to see my as well. Just a small trolling.

Gregory Engels, 2014-09-02 18:08

Recent comments

Ingo Seifert on Glückwunsch @herr_lampe at 20:16
Volker Weber on Futura Steps at 17:59
Ray Bilyk on Futura Steps at 17:57
Volker Weber on Futura Steps at 17:45
Ray Bilyk on Futura Steps at 17:32
Felix Binsack on Perfect Service at 13:39
Hanno Zulla on Samsung Considering Shake-Up in Management :: WSJ at 12:07
Hubert Stettner on Glückwunsch @herr_lampe at 12:02
Ingo Seifert on Grandmas Smoking Weed for the First Time at 11:28
Oluf Lorenzen on IBM Verse :: It could be worse at 13:37
Andrew Magerman on Verse: Die Neuerfindung der E-Mail, according to IBM at 10:48
Harald Gärttner on Verse: Die Neuerfindung der E-Mail, according to IBM at 00:22
Ian Bradbury on Verse: Die Neuerfindung der E-Mail, according to IBM at 00:00
Ian Bradbury on Brands and social media at 23:46
Frank Mueller on Ausflug nach Köln at 20:27
Hubert Stettner on Nigel Stanford :: CYMATICS :: Science vs. Music Nigel Stanford:: CYMATICS :: Science vs. Music at 13:27
Stephan Perthes on Nigel Stanford :: CYMATICS :: Science vs. Music Nigel Stanford:: CYMATICS :: Science vs. Music at 13:20
Ingo Seifert on Verse: Die Neuerfindung der E-Mail, according to IBM at 12:16
Volker Weber on Verse: Die Neuerfindung der E-Mail, according to IBM at 10:35
Christian Henseler on Verse: Die Neuerfindung der E-Mail, according to IBM at 10:13
Ingo Seifert on Verse: Die Neuerfindung der E-Mail, according to IBM at 08:00
Michael Jäckel on Nix klappt. Nur die Tür. at 22:53
Michael Sampson on Use and Adoption of IBM Connections: State of the Market 4Q2014 at 21:13
Christian Henseler on Verse: Die Neuerfindung der E-Mail, according to IBM at 19:41
Ingo Seifert on Ausflug nach Köln at 17:09

Ceci n'est pas un blog

vowe.net is a personal website published by Volker Weber a.k.a. vowe. I am an author, consultant and systems architect based in Darmstadt, Germany.

rss Click here to subscribe

Hello

About me
Contact
Publications
Certificates
Amazon Wish List
Frequently Asked Questions
Follow @vowe on Twitter

Local time is 22:20

visitors.gif

Tip jar

Archives

As most of my articles roll off the front page rather quickly, I am making an archive of previous posts available here. You can also use the handy search box at the top of the page if you are looking for something particular.

Last 30 days
More archives

Mobile tag for this page

© 1992-2014 Volker Weber.
All Rights Reserved.

Impressum