Court ruling against cell phone branding

by Ragnar Schierholz

According to multiple sources (e.g. Golem, Stiftung Warentest) the Amtsgericht Potsdam (county court of Potsdam) has ruled against T-Mobile Germany (case no. 34 C 563/04) and declared the common branding of cell phones into network operator editions as illegal.

May that be a sign of hope for all users who are sick of these branded, stripped-down functionality phones that come with the plan?

The customer had complained about a special button on his Siemens A60, initially designed to access new short messages (SMS) directly but reprogrammed by the network operator to access a service subject to charge. T-Mobiles legal department claimed that the phone was not malfunctioning but working properly, as designed in T-Mobiles branded version. A non-branded version of the phone would not be available from T-Mobile. The customer filed a law-suit, to which T-Mobile did not respond at all. Thus, the judge ruled a default-decree. Again T-Mobile didn't respond, thus the ruling is effecitve now. Apparently T-Mobile wanted to keep a low profile on the case.
The rule was justified by T-Mobiles marketing promise of a Siemens A60 phone but the delivery of a non-original phone. Thus, this rule could be applied to all branded phones which are still sold under their original product name, but not for phones which are sold under a new brand of the network operator (e.g. T-Mobiles MDA series).

Comments

"A non-branded version of the phone would not available from T-Mobile."

should either read:

"A non-branded version of the phone would not be available from T-Mobile."

or

"A non-branded version of the phone is/was not available from T-Mobile."

:-)

Ooops, corrected that.

>and declared the common branding of cell phones into network operator
>editions as illegal.

Wow, did we really read the same news-article? I came away with a totally different interpretation...

@Sencer: Well, the court has not yet published the rule online (at least I couldn't find it, but some articles said the ruling declared the branding as "unzulässig" which can be translated to illegal.

To put it clear:
The branding itself is not subject of the rule, but the distribution if the manipulated/branded phone under it's original product name with the original manuals etc. is. The customer was promised (in this case) a Siemens A60 phone and apparently received one (incl. the original Siemens manual). But the phone's software was altered to request a service subject to charge when a particular button was pushed. Siemens' manual and the on-screen manual said the button would open unread short messages (SMS). That was a misleading of the customer and is declared as "unzulässig".

In other words, if an MNO wants to offer branded phones (especially with less functionality), they have to offer them under a different name.

I'm wondering why you are linking to Golem instead of Heise online - Urteil gegen Handy-Branding. Are you going to diversify your media contacts? ;-)

Wups, I just recognized it was Ragnar, not Volker who wrote that article. Sorry for that ;-)

@Markus: I take that as a compliment ;-)

Post a comment











Shall I remember this for you?




Use your full name and a working email address. Unless you want your comment to be removed. No kidding.



Recent comments

Volker Weber on BIS customers now getting instant IMAP e-mail at 10:38
Dirk Steins on BIS customers now getting instant IMAP e-mail at 10:26
Yury Kats on Site news: Chrome already accounts for almost 10% of page hits at 02:59
Volker Weber on BIS customers now getting instant IMAP e-mail at 23:04
Stuart Mcintyre on BIS customers now getting instant IMAP e-mail at 22:59
Volker Weber on BIS customers now getting instant IMAP e-mail at 22:09
Jan-Piet Mens on BIS customers now getting instant IMAP e-mail at 22:01
Ingo Seifert on Nur bei Regen at 19:53
Dirk Steins on Nur bei Regen at 09:01
Carl Tyler on Everybody's PIN Number: Revealed! at 01:09
Armin Roth on Everybody's PIN Number: Revealed! at 00:43
Frank L. Quednau on Everybody's PIN Number: Revealed! at 23:42
Volker Weber on Everybody's PIN Number: Revealed! at 22:00
Chris Linfoot on Everybody's PIN Number: Revealed! at 21:57
Jan-Piet Mens on Everybody's PIN Number: Revealed! at 21:39
Marco Klop on Synchronizing iPhone with ... Lotus Notes at 18:55
sunny gerscky on Pwnage 2.0 released at 16:00
Tobias Lange on Remember, it's always the cable at 13:16
Volker Weber on Remember, it's always the cable at 12:21
Ian White on Remember, it's always the cable at 11:56
Andy Brunner on Remember, it's always the cable at 11:37
Ben Rose on Remember, it's always the cable at 11:33
Ben Poole on It has only been less than two hours at 09:44
Frank L. Quednau on It has only been less than two hours at 09:29
Martin Hiegl on It has only been less than two hours at 08:27

Ceci n'est pas un blog

vowe.net is a personal website published by Volker Weber a.k.a. vowe. I am an author, consultant and systems architect based in Darmstadt, Germany.

rss Click here to subscribe

Hello

About me
Contact
Publications
Certificates
Frequently asked questions

Twitter Updates

More >

Poll

Can you bring a camera phone to work?

Getting poll results. Please wait...

Local time is 11:51

visitors.gif
133 visitors online

News

Other sources of news, imported into my own format to make them more accessible:

Heise Online
Schlagzeilen
Weather

Archives

As most of my articles roll off the front page rather quickly, I am making an archive of previous posts available here. You can also use the handy search box at the top of the page if you are looking for something particular.

Last 30 days
More archives

Got the T-shirt?

Got the T-shirt?
Are you buying from the US?

Systems Architecture

This site runs on an Apache web server on top of the Linux operating system. The content is managed with MovableType which is implemented in Perl. Last but not least the HTML code your browser sees is put together with PHP.

© 1992-2008 Volker Weber.
All Rights Reserved.

Impressum