Taking SharePoint offline

by Volker Weber

Eric Rucker talks about database features in Access 12 and the reasoning behind them. They are introducing multiple values per field, and do it the proper way through normalizing the tables behind the scene. Interesting:

What it brings to Access is full schema compatibility with Windows SharePoint Services lists. This allows us to take SharePoint list data offline and to provide rich-client UI for SharePoint using Access.

Access shares something with Notes: an MDB, much like a Notes NSF, contains a full application with data and UI and code. So this is how Microsoft wants to make SharePoint available offline. It's not Groove, it's Access.

BTW: As Joel mentions, JET beyond 4.0 will no longer be re-distributable. The customer will need to have Access installed.

Comments

I think the interesting item here is being missed:

"They are introducing multiple values per field"

This will make it much much easier to port a Domino application to Access than it would be today. I can hear the MS Sales folks now, take your "department" level application that you have built with Domino and move them to access. They'll do this to try and spin the notion that Domino doesn't scale and is a department level application, ie none enterprise etc. etc.

Carl Tyler, 2005-10-17 23:47

Not so sure that you can clean up the not-normalized mess in Notes databases (let's run an agent. which updates all records, when this customer address changes).

Volker Weber, 2005-10-18 01:33

@Vowe,

Who designs Notes db's that store the address info in more than one record? :-)

BE

Bruce Elgort, 2005-10-18 01:56

Never seen an app like this? Then take property values hidden away in design elements. The kind of stuff departmental "developers" create.

Volker Weber, 2005-10-18 02:11

It doesn't matter if it works well or isn't a good idea, it just matters that it can be done.

Carl Tyler, 2005-10-18 03:43

@Carl: For marketing, that's right. For people who are actually working with the stuff, it certainly matters and I would deliberately fight off solutions that don't work well or aren't a good idea!

Ragnar Schierholz, 2005-10-18 08:30

@Ragnar: Isn't that where everyone typically acknowledges Microsoft are best and win the hearts and minds of potential customers?

Carl Tyler, 2005-10-18 14:48

Recent comments

Martin Kautz on New OS/2 version in 2016 at 11:45
Thomas Langel on New OS/2 version in 2016 at 11:11
Tobias Vogel on Spotify opens up interesting options with its Premium Family plan at 09:52
Ralf ter Veer on Microsoft won't fix 'Sleep of Death' bug at 09:30
Volker Weber on Long Ambients1: Calm. Sleep. at 09:21
Volker Weber on Spotify opens up interesting options with its Premium Family plan at 09:19
Tobias Vogel on Long Ambients1: Calm. Sleep. at 09:13
Tobias Vogel on Spotify opens up interesting options with its Premium Family plan at 09:10
Volker Weber on 365 days at 08:39
Michael Sampson on 365 days at 07:45
marc egart on Long Ambients1: Calm. Sleep. at 07:20
Roland Dressler on Microsoft won't fix 'Sleep of Death' bug at 07:04
Matt White on Microsoft won't fix 'Sleep of Death' bug at 22:36
Volker Weber on 365 days at 20:12
Fridolin Koch on 365 days at 18:48
Rob McDonagh on Microsoft won't fix 'Sleep of Death' bug at 18:45
Ralf ter Veer on Microsoft won't fix 'Sleep of Death' bug at 18:28
Amy Blumenfield on Microsoft won't fix 'Sleep of Death' bug at 18:16
Wolfram Votteler on Sonos + Dyson + Surface = zufrieden at 17:20
Volker Weber on 365 days at 16:02
Dirk Haunschild on 365 days at 14:53
Volker Weber on 365 days at 14:41
Sven Bühler on 365 days at 14:37
Volker Weber on Sonos + Dyson + Surface = zufrieden at 14:02
Volker Weber on Microsoft won't fix 'Sleep of Death' bug at 13:16

Ceci n'est pas un blog

I explain difficult concepts in simple ways. For free, and for money. Clue procurement and bullshit detection.

vowe

Contact
Publications
Amazon Wish List
Frequently Asked Questions

rss feed  twitter ello  instagram

snapchat

Local time is 12:38

visitors.gif