Somewhere on some server, in some SAN your life is cached. We are living a cached life. And it is going to get even more cached, as we turn to always-on wireless devices. Our RSS will be cached somewhere. So will be our thoughts that appear on blogs. Our TiVo watching patterns to music listening patterns in iTunes, and other such new conveniences are part of a new cached, convenient albeit less private life.
You have zero privacy anyway… Get over it.
Is privacy possible in the digital age? If you want something to be private, don't store it on a computer. Pull the plug. Bury all your digital devices and gadgets in a junk yard. Chop your credit cards and your other plastic. Move to a computer-free zone. Next question: Are there any left? Let's search for it in Google, oops ...
Addendum: Mmh, 'The Free Zone' ... could be a good theme for a postcyberpunk novel ...
There is no absolute privacy. Neither in the digital nor in the "real" life.
It's all a matter of effort. People can watch you, silently search your flat while you're gone, or just ask questions to your friends... it's all a matter of effort. In the digital world, people can try to tap into your WLAN, google for you or try to gather information from social networking sites... a matter of effort again.
The real question is: Is the effort to gather personal data in the digital world high enough to create a "felt privacy"?
Btw, "The Free Zone" sounds like a good idea. ^_^
Maybe there is a deep feeling inside of some people who believe that their data belong to them. More in a world where data of all kind is an asset, be it a clients list (company point of view) or just the know-how of how to handle efficiently a piece of software (employee point of view). So indeed it is finally everyones own responsibility to take care of his own privacy, which leads to questions like:
How can I secure information I consider important to me?
What is a good place to store a private key?
What happens if privacy is defined as a hostile move?
Article about acountability: http://www.schneier.com/crypto-gram-0601.html#1
Of coz, you're right, Florian. That's why I wrote "oops ..." at the end. I admit, it was quite cryptic ...
What's the plot of "The Free Zone"? In three sentences: A ordinary guy in the year 2030 is accused of capital patriot search crime. He is on the run and tries to escape to a computer-free zone. But nobody knows where this zone really is. Will he make it?
The free Zone... Have you read "The Shockwave Rider"? I think this novel and your post basically talk about the same thing. I re-read it last summer. It's worth the time.
Pose yourself the following question: »What level of privacy do I have in my neighborhood?«
The same result you get from answering yourself this question applies for the Internet — except the fact that the network neighborhood is quite a bit larger…
Joseph O'Laughlin on Here we go again at 20:07
Marc Henkel on Here we go again at 19:41
Heiko Müller on Google Arts & Culture at 15:15
Daniel Haferkorn on Qualitätsjournalismus at 14:38
Andy Brunner on Google Arts & Culture at 13:50
Volker Weber on Stuff that works :: Olloclip Active Lens at 13:18
Bernd Schuster on Stuff that works :: Olloclip Active Lens at 13:14
Bernd Hofmann on Qualitätsjournalismus at 13:03
Markus Philippi on Qualitätsjournalismus at 10:37
Volker Weber on Headset recommendation at 10:03
Timo Zimmermann on Headset recommendation at 08:32
Christian Rosner on Headset recommendation at 20:12
Ingo Seifert on Listen to this! at 18:27
Dan Sickles on Sonos 101 at 16:01
Volker Weber on Sonos 101 at 14:17
Friedrich Holstein on Sonos 101 at 14:08
thorsten ebers on Sonos 101 at 12:14
Ian Bradbury on Stuff that works :: Olloclip Active Lens at 10:26
Volker Weber on Stuff that works :: Olloclip Active Lens at 06:29
Jonathan Griep on Stuff that works :: Olloclip Active Lens at 02:46
Ingo Seifert on Sonos 101 at 18:42
Markus Dierker on Sonos 101 at 17:20
Henning Kunz on Begegnung im Park at 08:39
Michael Oehme on Begegnung im Park at 19:38
Volker Weber on Begegnung im Park at 16:57