Different strokes for different folks
by Volker Weber
A number of very vocal people seem to have difficulties running their sites on 1&1 servers. This does not apply to me so I wanted to give a short testimonial of how good things can be. Usually I do not publish any traffic information, but I want to share a small chart with you:

This graph describes traffic on vowe.net from 1999 to 2006 with a peek of 1.65 mio hits/month in January 2006. During this time we have not experienced any downtime. I am not so much concerned with the absolute numbers but with the traffic increase. The site has been able to serve this traffic without any major reengineering.
However, I am constantly fending off abusive robots. Without this effort the graph would look exponential. Yesterday was a busy day with 77,657 hits, but we can discount 11,861 of them.
In case you are wondering: The steep incline started at the same time I began updating my site on a regular basis. The large spike in 2001 was a load test. At that time I though I had ruined my traffic chart. :-)
Comments
The steep incline started at the same time I began updating my site on a regular basis.You mean the time the site became "no blog" ;-)
Zactly. :-)
A scale on the y-axis now would be interesting. But that probably is beyond the limit of "usually I do not publish any traffic information". Too bad.
Zactly. :-)
I can only second this: We run three root servers at 1&1, and their very reliable, support is fine, nothing to complain about. Of course we don't have your or the main complainer's traffic ;-)
s/their/they're. Usually doesn't happen to me :-)
My traffic isn't *exactly* comparable, but I have been a happy 1&1 user since 2001...only nag they don't support hosting 'es' domains, but hey...
I have not hitherto been vocal about 1and1, and by and large have been pretty satisfied with them, but this morning makes me very angry - a database server which runs an important app for a client has had odd periods of running very slow for the past couple of months (okay, so perhaps I should have migrated it) and I could not interest 1and1 in what looked to me from a distance, like a hardware issue.
Then this morning the server has crashed (having first tried to convince me that I could not be seeing what I was just seeing) and they 'cannot anticipate' how long it will take to bring it back online, and may have to get me to migrate the system myself - I am not impressed, bearing in mind what I pay them for a 'professional service'.
Sorry, but had to blow off steam on this one.....
Post a comment
Recent comments
Ben Poole
on Finally getting started on last.fm at 12:41
Volker Weber
on Finally getting started on last.fm at 12:31
Ben Rose
on Finally getting started on last.fm at 12:22
Yves Luther
on Coming up next Thursday: sticky and sweet at 12:19
Hartmut Wiehr
on Wo gibt es gescheite CD-Läden? at 11:13
Michael Becker
on Wo gibt es gescheite CD-Läden? at 10:26
heiko hebig
on Amazing photos - all taken with a mobile phone at 01:50
Chris Reckling
on Finally getting started on last.fm at 00:53
Alexander Kluge
on Finally getting started on last.fm at 22:31
Volker Weber
on Finally getting started on last.fm at 22:22
Jamey Shiels
on Synchronizing iPhone with ... Lotus Notes at 22:10
Dominik Schwind
on Finally getting started on last.fm at 21:25
Kevin Pettitt
on Showstopper for Lotus Connections at 20:45
Martin Hiegl
on Showstopper for Lotus Connections at 19:27
goran angelov
on iPhone: Can't hear through the receiver or speakers? at 18:53
Sean Cull
on I have seen faster at 18:27
Matthias Leisi
on Coming up next Thursday: sticky and sweet at 18:21
Ted Stanton
on Showstopper for Lotus Connections at 18:17
Handly Cameron
on Showstopper for Lotus Connections at 18:15
Volker Weber
on Showstopper for Lotus Connections at 18:11
Alan Lepofsky
on Showstopper for Lotus Connections at 18:09
Volker Weber
on Showstopper for Lotus Connections at 18:04
Ben Rose
on Showstopper for Lotus Connections at 18:04
Ted Stanton
on Showstopper for Lotus Connections at 17:52
Ben Poole
on Showstopper for Lotus Connections at 17:48



