The question was simple. Here are the results:
you miss one item in the poll: obsolete
@armin, Approving an obsolete standard would be bad.
There's also ugly.
OOXML is both bad and ugly.
Amusing comment from an anonymous poster at The Register:
In a surprise move, ISO certifies the Zune as the world standard MP3 player, shortly after certifying Microsoft Bob, Internet Information Server and Vista.
@Ben - The verb to certify used to mean (among its many other meanings) the act of legally declaring someone insane, usually as a precursor to depriving that person of his or her liberty.
Nowadays people are sectioned (per sections 2, 3, 4, 5(2), 5(4) et al of the Mental Health Act 1983).
Perhaps this is what is meant by the certification of Zune, Bob, IIS and Vista.
They've been sectioned or declared legally insane.
That would make as much sense as standardising OOXML.
@Kerr: thanks, you reminded me that I ususally mix up obsolete with superfluous, which is more what I missed in the poll.
@armin, well, approving a superfluous standard would be bad too. As would approving one that was ugly, potentially patent encumbered or practically impossible to implement.
Not that I'm saying any of these things apply to OOXML. Oh no, just pointing out things that would be bad in general. ;)
C'mon -- this means just that Microsoft can save some lobbying/bribery when selling to the public sector. Frankly, My Dear, I don't give a damn.
Also, from a technical viewpoint I unterstand their point that ODF cannot deliver backwards compatibility for the older binary office file formats (e.g. Pivot tables in Excel).
So we've got two XML based office file formats now. Choice is always a good thing.
Hopefully it us a standard for baddness ... like the standard that the one that states a motorcycle is exactly not the same as a Brussel Sprout?
Hope is a wonderfully pointless exercise :(
@Thomas: neither ODF nor OOXML can deliver backwards compatibility - that's part of MS' spin. Only applications that perform the translation can do that. OOXML just copies the data structures from the old formats to bad XML.
The easier way - for everyone but MS - would have been to release a specification of the binary Office formats and help introduce the missing features in ODF.
Legacy files must still be transformed to OOXML, but MS Office can now keep it's data structures which are most probably represented by those in the document formats. It won't become any easier for any other application.
And I totally disagree with two standards for the same thing being a good idea (there are reasons available if still necessary). The misleading goal of backward compatibility was introduced in order have a differentiation between OOXML and ODF.
A good article with a very simple and explanatory comparison of the two standards.
Il really makes you wonder...
@Arnd, While I agree for the most part, backwards compatibility predominantly about applications not formats, the new format must support a supper set of features that the old version did for the application to save all the data in the new format.
Unfortunately OOXML often does this by having big chunks that are "application defined". It's a standard that doesn't actually define what the standard is.
Volker Weber on Three days :: Three Launches at 06:14
Ingo Müller on Three days :: Three Launches at 06:04
Horia Stanescu on Three days :: Three Launches at 18:45
Roland Dressler on Three days :: Three Launches at 18:44
Volker Weber on Three days :: Three Launches at 17:59
Roland Dressler on Three days :: Three Launches at 17:53
Karl Heindel on Three days :: Three Launches at 12:45
Tobias Bäumer on Fritz!Box 7580 at 19:59
Eric Bredtmann on Six weeks with the Sen.se ThermoPeanut at 18:23
Torsten Armbruster on Fritz!Box 7580 at 15:39
Michael Klüsener on Fritz!Box 7580 at 13:15
Patrick Bohr on Fritz!Box 7580 at 11:51
Patrick Bohr on Fritz!Box 7580 at 11:46
Torsten Armbruster on Fritz!Box 7580 at 10:35
Armin Roth on Plantronics updates the BackBeat Pro cans at 09:17
Michael Klüsener on Fritz!Box 7580 at 07:54
Axel Koerv on Fritz!Box 7580 at 23:40
Henning Heinz on Logitech K780 :: What a keyboard at 18:38
Volker Weber on Fritz!Box 7580 at 18:25
Volker Weber on Fritz!Box 7580 at 18:04
Volker Weber on Logitech K780 :: What a keyboard at 17:58
Axel Koerv on Fritz!Box 7580 at 17:49
Daniel Meyer on Logitech K780 :: What a keyboard at 16:19
Bernd Hofmann on Logitech K780 :: What a keyboard at 15:17
Bastian Anthon on Logitech K780 :: What a keyboard at 14:54