Lots of things have been said about IBM laying off some of their best people, offering some of them jobs in low-wage regions. This from a company with record profits, in business areas that report record growth over years.
I understand that businesses have to adjust to changing markets. If a company feels it needs to lay off people, that can only mean one of two things: bad outlook or bad ethics. We will see what it is for IBM.
Volker, that is somewhat over simplified. Keeping profit up is essential for raising capital, which is essential for investing in new business, innovations and new ideas. And good profits are even essential for customers selecting their vendors. No customer wants to buy from an unhealthy vendor. I do not think it´s a clear cut decision between money and moral.
Felix, IBM tells me its business is booming and healthy.
what strikes me odd is that they try to keep it under hidden instead of telling whats done. hiding stuff under the carpet usually misfires.
Well the IBM x86 server business for example is neither booming nor healthy. No surprise for me as I see projects now being won by vendors that have a full story from Desktop / Mobile solutions to Servers.
And even if a business is booming and healthy raising shareholders value often can be a challenge. At the end you often end up charging more for less and cutting costs. Unfortunately in many segments there now are oligopolies and the big players share a common strategy.
Is it signs of the time? Jobs are shifted from the US to Asia and South America. IBM is becoming less and less a US company. Less the half of the workforce is US based for quite a while and almost half of the revenue comes from units with managers that don't have a US boss short of Sam. So the business might have been healthy but might not sustain in the US.
We live in interesting times as the old Chinese curse goes.
Volker Weber on 365 days at 08:39
Michael Sampson on 365 days at 07:45
marc egart on Long Ambients1: Calm. Sleep. at 07:20
Roland Dressler on Microsoft won't fix 'Sleep of Death' bug at 07:04
Matt White on Microsoft won't fix 'Sleep of Death' bug at 22:36
Volker Weber on 365 days at 20:12
Fridolin Koch on 365 days at 18:48
Rob McDonagh on Microsoft won't fix 'Sleep of Death' bug at 18:45
Ralf ter Veer on Microsoft won't fix 'Sleep of Death' bug at 18:28
Amy Blumenfield on Microsoft won't fix 'Sleep of Death' bug at 18:16
Wolfram Votteler on Sonos + Dyson + Surface = zufrieden at 17:20
Volker Weber on 365 days at 16:02
Dirk Haunschild on 365 days at 14:53
Volker Weber on 365 days at 14:41
Sven Bühler on 365 days at 14:37
Volker Weber on Sonos + Dyson + Surface = zufrieden at 14:02
Volker Weber on Microsoft won't fix 'Sleep of Death' bug at 13:16
Thomas Cloer on Microsoft won't fix 'Sleep of Death' bug at 12:56
Erik Ferrari on 365 days at 11:45
Dirk Steins on 365 days at 11:25
John Keys on Sonos + Dyson + Surface = zufrieden at 10:55
Federico Hernandez on 365 days at 21:30
John Keys on Long Ambients1: Calm. Sleep. at 20:56
Hagen Bauer on 365 days at 19:17
Hubert Stettner on Long Ambients1: Calm. Sleep. at 18:09