"Getting people hooked on using Office in a collaborative mode at home is super-important to getting them to use it that way at work," he said. "If you lose the consumer, you lose the enterprise."
IBM has lost this fight long ago, with Notes and with Smartsuite, against Outlook and Office. I am not too optimistic that they can win it with Symphony but they certainly should keep trying. I think that Google is making inroads with GMail but not so much with Docs & Spreadsheets.
It is the difference between a bottom up and a top down approach. Microsoft was and still is successfull in doing it the first way. They always were. Or why do you think installing word, excel and powerpoint on any PC you had without having a license key was so easy for such a long time.
Lotus and later on IBM have no record for doing it this way. And i think that might be the basic reason why IBM simply does not get it.
Steve Mills never made a secret of what he thinks of IBM and the consumer market.
"For the consumer, no. We have made it clear in the market that our orientation is not toward [the consumer]. It is not that we wonít help others serve the consumer, we are happy to do that, but we donít want to be consumer facing. That is not our forte."
Source: Information Age (2008)
And Symphony repeats many of the mistakes of Open Office. It will be interesting what will happen with Symphony and/or Open Office when IBM takes over SUN (although I am more nervous about MySQL).
@Henning - what do you perceive as the mistakes of Open Office? Are you talking about the product, or the way it is marketed and distributed?
Back in 2007 I wrote
The days when you and I, IT professionals, could dictate the technology used in business purely on its technological merit, including fitness for purpose, are gone. Nowadays, everybody is an IT expert because they all have computers at home. They all run XP or Vista and they are all loaded with lots of Microsoft software.
This is truer now than it was then - the battle for IT users' hearts and minds is won in the home, not the office.
What is true for IBM is also true for Microsoft. Consumer preference for MS is declining with services like Google, alternatives like Apple or Linux, etc. being available. I hear frequently about my user's aversions to Vista and Office 2007 for their personal computing needs. Eight months after our company conversion to Office 2007, the typical opinion is neutral ...or worse.
Good viable alternatives exist. Email is a great example. How many people actually are using Outlook Express at home? I havenít answered a single Outlook Express question in years. MS will continue to dominate for years with inertia. I believe it to be more a matter of convenience than "hearts and minds."
So, IBM, ironically, has won the home market because there's an IBM processor in every Nintendo Wii, MS Xbox and Sony PS3.....
It's not just at home, it's in the schools, too. There is no other productivity package in schools and universities, that market is owned by Microsoft and taught by your children's teachers. They are spitting out Office Users at an alarming rate.
spitting out Office Users at an alarming rate
That is bad, and not because it is MS-Office -- same goes for any single product. Schools should educate.
Dennis, yes, this is certainly a problem that Msft faces.
Harald Gaerttner on PhotoMath at 16:18
Ingo Seifert on PhotoMath at 16:06
Craig Wiseman on Galaxy Note 4 keeps growing on me at 15:41
Adrian Woizik on PhotoMath at 15:40
Volker Weber on Galaxy Note 4 keeps growing on me at 15:26
Craig Wiseman on Galaxy Note 4 keeps growing on me at 15:07
Richard Kaufmann on HERE on Android at 09:46
John Keys on MixRadio on Sonos at 09:26
Volker Weber on Samsung Galaxy Note 4 has landed at 23:31
Hubert Stettner on Apple’s Jonathan Ive describes his design process at 23:10
Paul Mooney on Apple’s Jonathan Ive describes his design process at 22:46
Ian Bradbury on Samsung Galaxy Note 4 has landed at 21:46
Olaf Boerner on Das DNUG Büro informiert at 16:17
Matthias Lorz on Apple’s Jonathan Ive describes his design process at 11:54
Mirko Zellner on Das DNUG Büro informiert at 11:33
Stefan Lattermann on Das DNUG Büro informiert at 11:16
Ulrich Willer on Samsung Galaxy Note 4 has landed at 10:53
Jochen Kattoll on Apple’s Jonathan Ive describes his design process at 02:18
Roland Dressler on Samsung Galaxy Note 4 has landed at 15:55
Volker Weber on Samsung Galaxy Note 4 has landed at 12:14
ulrich willer on Samsung Galaxy Note 4 has landed at 11:54
Jan Lauer on Apple’s Jonathan Ive describes his design process at 01:48
Volker Weber on Samsung Galaxy Note 4 has landed at 00:01
Wilken Hustedt on Samsung Galaxy Note 4 has landed at 23:57
Marcus Schmidt on Samsung Galaxy Note 4 has landed at 20:52