The Lotus Knows IdeaJam is over. It had a lot of traffic, ringing up as many hits an hour as IdeaJam usually has in a week. That is two orders of magnitude. A positive and bonding experience. It's over and you can add two phrases to your bingo card: "almost a thousand" and "more than twentythousand". It is going down in Lotus history as a win in itself.
But it's only a means to an end. Lotus said, they wanted ideas. And for those who have been hanging around for a while, many, many of those ideas were somewhat familiar. Actually, Lotus has been told these ideas for years on end. Don't do fluffy brand marketing, show the product, involve students and universities, make Lotus technology available for home users, etc. etc.
I have asked last week why there was so little attendance by the German community. I gave a few reasons, but the biggest ones came back in emails. "Why do I have to tell Lotus again?" - "NATO - No Action Talk Only", etc. etc.
So now it is time for action. There has been plenty of talk. Remember "yellow is the new black" from a past Lotusphere closing session? Ended up as mail footer. Or "air cover" from a more recent? Nothing happened. But, boy, is it going to happen. The ball is in IBM's court.
I have no idea if IBM knows that in August Europe is on holidays.... me, too.
Well, it was one of the reasons I submitted an idea. "Global" initiatives are often US-American. And they don't necessarily know that all of France, Italy and Spain are on vacation in August. ;-)
I am really interested which ideas will be followed up by Lotus in what time frame. Maybe a consolidated public list (on IdeaJam) is a good start that something is going to happen at IBM.
Very true... the ball *is* in IBM's court. I am cautiously/cynically optimistic that this time will be different. Actions will ultimately tell the story.
Volker I think you have summarised it all quite well. IBM are just going to hear alot of what many of old hands have been whining about for years.
If IBM had some foresight in this process they have started, they would have let the voting continue after the close to provide a clear picture of intent, and also let the wider community give feedback, rather than the yellow-zealots who will not really provide any new insights than we already have.
Given how they've shut the site off so quickly, it comes across as disingenuous of this process they are proposing to follow. Hopefully I am wrong about this...
Markus Dierker on Dyson DC62 und V6 at 22:33
Oliver Regelmann on Stuff that works :: Der Fluffy at 20:51
Armin Grewe on Who needs a car, when you can have this? at 17:39
Volker Weber on Stuff that works :: Der Fluffy at 11:27
Johannes Matzke on Stuff that works :: Der Fluffy at 09:57
Volker Weber on Stuff that works :: Der Fluffy at 23:50
Martin Funk on Stuff that works :: Der Fluffy at 23:35
Volker Weber on Emoji predictions at 21:43
Stuart McIntyre on Emoji predictions at 21:41
Gerhard Poul on Number26 :: Das war einfach at 19:44
Armin Grewe on How to deal with Twitter spam at 16:40
Markus Dierker on Who needs a car, when you can have this? at 16:35
Henning Kunz on Der Fluffy macht's at 12:02
Ragnar Schierholz on Who needs a car, when you can have this? at 21:44
Volker Weber on Surface 3 is being phased out at 18:03
Johannes Matzke on Surface 3 is being phased out at 18:01
Hubert Stettner on Who needs a car, when you can have this? at 15:46
Ian Bradbury on Who needs a car, when you can have this? at 14:47
Volker Weber on How to deal with Twitter spam at 07:54
Karl Heindel on How to deal with Twitter spam at 07:50
Ragnar Schierholz on Site News at 21:47
Ludwig Deruyck on How to deal with Twitter spam at 20:26
Richard Schwartz on IBM Connections Premier and IBM Connections Compliance at 15:57
Hubert Stettner on IBM Connections Premier and IBM Connections Compliance at 14:45
Christopher Schmidt on Site News at 14:28