The owner of Planet Lotus, Yancy Lent, asked me yesterday if he should move this site to "Planet Sharepoint" instead. ... I said no, don't move it, ... However, he seems quite insistent and hinted that he'd have to "de-list" me in the interim ...
I cannot believe that Yancy Lent is behind this stupid idea.
I think too much is being read into this.
Yancy has a companion “Planet” site for Sharepoint, and looking at the SP sites out there, not many people are writing the sort of stuff Jake is: I can understand why Yancy would want Jake’s posts on Planet Sharepoint.
I haven’t seen anything from anyone that categorically states, “Thou shalt be de-listed from PlanetLotus henceforth” and I know Jake takes exception to his content being aggregated / published elsewhere, so I don’t imagine for one moment that he would entertain the idea of a separate newsfeed purely for his Sharepoint stuff (or whatever).
It’s just a lot of hot air I reckon. Otherwise, many many others would face “de-listing”—you and me included.
Point taken. But why would Yancy suggest that he would have to de-list Jake?
It's a conspiracy, don'tchaknow?!
Seriously, I get Jake's want for publishing the story... but how does this post help the "yellow bubble" that it's specifically targeted for?
It's your site, so by all means post what you want... but regardless of the technology or platform discussed, I think it's all just disruptive chatter that distracts people from the posts that actually will help them with their jobs.
Just my opinion, as you are entitled to your own.
I am not really sure what you want to say. I know it's my site, and I can pretty much say what I want. On site, and off site. So what are you on about?
I'm sure lots of people want to hide the dirty laundry but I'm glad to know at least a bit about what's going on.
I just discovered PlanetLotus only recently and, frankly, for me it isn't that useful. I don't care if Jake is listed on it or not; CodeStore is in my RSS reader and is the first blog I look at every day. I'm sorry he hasn't embraced xPages because then I'd have a better resource for learning it myself.
As far as I'm concerned, CodeStore is still the best Notes/Domino blog that I read. So PlanetLotus thinking about de-listing it says more to me about PlanetLotus than about CodeStore. It says to me that diversity of opinion is not welcome there.
Don't let this place become the TMZ of the yellowverse
You can read the full email exchange here: http://planetlotus.org/6f93c0
Thanks, Yancy. Added as an update to the post.
It still seems a lot of fuss about nothing to me (especially when you skim some of the comments at codestore: “over-reaction” isn’t the half of it).
I can see both points of view, and fail to understand why a perfectly amicable compromise / arrangement can’t be reached. It seems odd that Jake calls out Yancy for “going public” with the email thread when he started the whole thing in the first place.
Hey ho, just another PL storm in a teacup :-)
That is basically Ed's tweet which I added to the comments over at Jake's. Maybe everything can just stay as it has worked well so far.
Woh. Too many conversations going on about this now.
I agree. It's getting just a bit out of control (I never mean it to) and expect to find out soon it was all some elaborate publicity exercise for Planet Sharepoint. How many people know it exists now that didn't this morning?
I just seem to have a nack to alienate people (sorry Ben, I know you're one of them). Kind of wish I could just brush it all under the carpet and pretend it never happened.
@ben. I didn't call him out for going public (or did I?). I just don't see what he aimed to achieve from it.
Jake: you’re an excellent writer, with a keen eye for the UI (ooh poetry). You haven’t alienated anyone from where I’m standing, so keep doing what you do.
Oluf Lorenzen on IBM Verse :: It could be worse at 13:37
Andrew Magerman on Verse: Die Neuerfindung der E-Mail, according to IBM at 10:48
Harald Gärttner on Verse: Die Neuerfindung der E-Mail, according to IBM at 00:22
Ian Bradbury on Verse: Die Neuerfindung der E-Mail, according to IBM at 00:00
Ian Bradbury on Brands and social media at 23:46
Frank Mueller on Ausflug nach Köln at 20:27
Hubert Stettner on Nigel Stanford :: CYMATICS :: Science vs. Music Nigel Stanford:: CYMATICS :: Science vs. Music at 13:27
Stephan Perthes on Nigel Stanford :: CYMATICS :: Science vs. Music Nigel Stanford:: CYMATICS :: Science vs. Music at 13:20
Ingo Seifert on Verse: Die Neuerfindung der E-Mail, according to IBM at 12:16
Volker Weber on Verse: Die Neuerfindung der E-Mail, according to IBM at 10:35
Christian Henseler on Verse: Die Neuerfindung der E-Mail, according to IBM at 10:13
Ingo Seifert on Verse: Die Neuerfindung der E-Mail, according to IBM at 08:00
Michael Jäckel on Nix klappt. Nur die Tür. at 22:53
Michael Sampson on Use and Adoption of IBM Connections: State of the Market 4Q2014 at 21:13
Christian Henseler on Verse: Die Neuerfindung der E-Mail, according to IBM at 19:41
Ingo Seifert on Ausflug nach Köln at 17:09
Ingo Seifert on Verse: Die Neuerfindung der E-Mail, according to IBM at 17:04
Alex Heller on Ausflug nach Köln at 13:11
Hubert Stettner on Ausflug nach Köln at 11:04
Markus Heyl on Microsoft did not buy all of Nokia at 10:43
Bernd Vellguth on Verse: Die Neuerfindung der E-Mail, according to IBM at 10:29
Lars Berntrop-Bos on Microsoft did not buy all of Nokia at 09:52
Stephan H. Wissel on Microsoft did not buy all of Nokia at 03:33
Volker Weber on Microsoft did not buy all of Nokia at 23:26
Felix Binsack on Microsoft did not buy all of Nokia at 23:23