How to read quarterly reports

by Volker Weber

If you read that a business lost 10% revenue four quarters in a row, what is the total loss for the year? Hint: it's not minus 40%, nor minus 34.39% for those better at math. It's minus 10%. Why? Each quarter is measured year over year, against the same quarter of last year. Since each quarter lost 10% over last year's quarter, the total revenue for that year also lost only 10%.

What does that mean for the Lotus numbers*? I have set up a little table with the numbers readily available by going to http://www.ibm.com/investor/3q12/press.phtml and then replacing the year and quarter. 2009 is the earliest full year on that pattern.

I am setting 2008 as 100%. The quarters do not have equal revenue as you might imagine, but the table still helps to understand how the mechanics work. The second quarter is the one with the most up and downs, the fourth quarter is very steady. You may find your own explanation. Mine is that in the fourth quarter you are trying to reel in whatever you can to meet your target.

Overall, Lotus is losing revenue, but not as much as you may have thought.

*) This is ceteris paribus. It does not account for currency changes, nor does it account for a changing set of product revenues consolidated under one brand. It's only based on the press reports.

Comments

Very interesting!
I never thought of it that way, but math was of course never my strongest subject in school. :-) Very nice overview, and a good explanation.

Karl-Henry Martinsson, 2012-10-17 16:22

Die Zahlen sind für sich gesehen nicht so schlecht. Ich hätte spontan auch einen anderen Wert seit 2008 geschätzt.
Für die Performance einer Sparte sind diese Zahlen aber nur bedingt aussagefähig.
Dazu müsste man berücksichtigen wie sich unter anderem der Gesamtmarkt und die direkten Konkurrenten über diesen Zeitraum entwickelt haben.
Außerdem gab es seit 2008, teilweise massive, Preiserhöhungen in der Lotus Produktlinie.
Mit Connections hat die IBM ein Produkt im Portfolio, welches bei Großkunden signifikante (Neu)Umsätze erzielen dürfte.
Zumindest für die Produktgruppe, für die ich mich persönlich interessiere, stellt sich die Situation nicht ganz so rosig dar. Das von Dir ins Leben gerufene Wiki untermauert das auch recht deutlich. Auch bei Betrachtung der DAX Unternehmen ist ein Trend deutlich erkennbar.
Unternehmen machen (subjektiv betrachtet) nach einer Migration vieles anders aber selten etwas wirklich besser. Sie erkaufen sich allerdings oft eine höhere Mitarbeiterzufriedenheit. Dieser Punkt ist lange Jahre unterschätzt worden.
Danke für die aufschlussreichen Zahlen (und den Wiki).

Henning Heinz, 2012-10-18 10:37

Es geht mir nicht darum, die Entwicklung von Lotus zu dokumentieren. Ich will nur erklären, wie man diese Quartalsergebnisse liest.

Volker Weber, 2012-10-18 10:41

Recent comments

Franz Mattes on Mittagsspaziergang at 06:52
Eric Hancock on iPhone 6 NFC chip is restricted to Apple Pay at 04:32
Ingo Seifert on iPhone 6 NFC chip is restricted to Apple Pay at 00:24
Ingo Seifert on iPhone 6 NFC chip is restricted to Apple Pay at 23:38
Andrew Magerman on iPhone 6 NFC chip is restricted to Apple Pay at 16:34
Volker Weber on iPhone 6 NFC chip is restricted to Apple Pay at 15:38
Craig Wiseman on iPhone 6 NFC chip is restricted to Apple Pay at 15:28
Eric Bredtmann on iPhone 6 NFC chip is restricted to Apple Pay at 14:17
Johannes Matzke on iPhone 6 NFC chip is restricted to Apple Pay at 12:45
Volker Weber on iPhone 6 NFC chip is restricted to Apple Pay at 09:07
Ole Saalmann on iPhone 6 NFC chip is restricted to Apple Pay at 09:04
Stefan Funke on Why Would Anybody Buy an Apple Watch? at 22:08
Maik Endler on Withings at 20:51
Volker Weber on I bet you did not see this coming from BlackBerry at 14:28
Roland Dressler on A Watch Guy's Thoughts On The Apple Watch After Seeing It In The Metal at 14:24
Karl Heindel on I bet you did not see this coming from BlackBerry at 13:18
Oliver Regelmann on I bet you did not see this coming from BlackBerry at 11:47
Dragon Cotterill on I bet you did not see this coming from BlackBerry at 10:39
Ralph Hammann on I bet you did not see this coming from BlackBerry at 10:13
Abdelkader Boui on I bet you did not see this coming from BlackBerry at 22:55
Volker Weber on I bet you did not see this coming from BlackBerry at 22:35
Bodo Menke on I bet you did not see this coming from BlackBerry at 22:28
Abdelkader Boui on I bet you did not see this coming from BlackBerry at 22:01
Ingo Seifert on Mittagsspaziergang at 21:29
Volker Weber on Mittagsspaziergang at 21:13

Ceci n'est pas un blog

vowe.net is a personal website published by Volker Weber a.k.a. vowe. I am an author, consultant and systems architect based in Darmstadt, Germany.

rss Click here to subscribe

Hello

About me
Contact
Publications
Certificates
Amazon Wish List
Frequently Asked Questions
Follow @vowe on Twitter

Local time is 09:31

visitors.gif

Tip jar

Archives

As most of my articles roll off the front page rather quickly, I am making an archive of previous posts available here. You can also use the handy search box at the top of the page if you are looking for something particular.

Last 30 days
More archives

Mobile tag for this page

© 1992-2014 Volker Weber.
All Rights Reserved.

Impressum