Alex moves his domain to GMail
by Volker Weber
I am looking forward to learn from his experience.
Comments
I just did the same yesterday. First thing I noticed was that the IP number of the hosted Gmail is on some spamfilters blacklists. Emails send are returned from at least www.sorbs.net spamfilter. Apparantly this seems not to be a unique issue:
http://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=27642
http://groups.google.com/group/Gmail-Problem-solving/browse_thread/thread/edeb06dcf0813372/2c741059afe4e023?lnk=st&q=sorbs+gmail&rnum=1#2c741059afe4e023
Maybe Google's using of a seperate ip address for hosted Gmail could diminish the problem.
I think this could become a real problem for hosted Gmail.
Many of Gmail's outbound relays are now widely blacklisted not because Gmail spam is a huge problem but because some of the small number of spams that do make it out of Gmail have hit spamtraps used to feed some popular DNSBLs (examples: Spamcop and the SORBS spamtrap zone).
If Google would reveal the source IP of the submitting party in their Received headers then this blacklisting of Gmail relays would not happen. Google won't reveal source IPs though, citing entirely spurious privacy concerns.
Aside to Gmail users: Because email you send through Gmail's web interface does not reveal the submission IP in the headers, you can send Gmail with complete anonymity - I'm not sure this is a good thing.
"3 of the Gmail servers continuously spew 419 spams, and Gmail have indicated their solution will take at least 3 months to deploy (they have not indicated what it is as they say that would enable us to defeat it) - until that time you are better white listing Gmail servers and putting up with the 419 spam if that is what you want - personally I don't hold much in the way to competence with regard to Gmail currently." (source: Sorbs management, half a year ago and still up to date)
Now the content of mails you send to *@kluge.de will be scanned by Googles algorithms. Alex accepted the terms of Google, but the people that write mails to him didn’t.
That is a problem of trust with all e-mail providers, but as far as I know Google is the only one which is scanning mail of content. That why I avoid sending mails to gMail addresses, but with domain instead of gMail at the end I can not easily control this any more. Also many people forward any mails to gMail accounts.
Don't be evil ... don't care about privacy
Well, Daniel, in the future in Europe every Internet Provider has to save the traffic data. And now guess, where the emails are. They are part of that data and the police can come and read your email. Like it? I don't!
But I don't have any problems with alghorithms scanning the emails without reading/understanding it and using the anonymous statistics generated by the content. I don't understand where there might be a lost privacy. It's like a scanner in the station or the airport scanning for example how tall the people are and generating a statistic needed by ethnic scientists. I hope Google can improve there service for me by scanning the emails of their customers and gaining anonymous knowledge.
Interesting: https://mail.google.com/mail/help/more.html
I also went to Gmail with hiegl.net two weeks ago. I really like the possibility to offer my familiy such an excellent webmailer with that much space. As I wrote (sorry in German) the day before yesterday I just dont't like that I cannot "really" join my Gmail- and my hosted Gmailaccount
Daniel, that's where GPG steps in. ;-)
Post a comment
Recent comments
Volker Weber
on No surprises at the PhilNote at 21:53
Ben Poole
on No surprises at the PhilNote at 21:07
Pieterjan Lansbergen
on No surprises at the PhilNote at 21:03
Jan Tietze
on No surprises at the PhilNote at 20:48
Ben Rose
on No surprises at the PhilNote at 15:14
Ben Rose
on No surprises at the PhilNote at 14:46
Philipp Sury
on No surprises at the PhilNote at 13:40
Sascha Reissner
on No surprises at the PhilNote at 13:28
Ben Rose
on No surprises at the PhilNote at 12:10
Colin Williams
on No surprises at the PhilNote at 09:43
Adalbert Duda
on No surprises at the PhilNote at 09:33
Volker Weber
on No surprises at the PhilNote at 09:28
Jan Tietze
on No surprises at the PhilNote at 08:53
Ben Rose
on No surprises at the PhilNote at 08:14
Volker Weber
on No surprises at the PhilNote at 04:50
Amy Blumenfield
on No surprises at the PhilNote at 01:36
Richard Schwartz
on Peter O'Kelly: I am now a Microsoft employee at 02:49
Hanno Zulla
on Ente Chop Sui at 22:32
Kristof Doffing
on Ich helfe gerne aus der Autokrise at 15:03
Bruce Lill
on IBM is not going to send out a press release at 00:31
Thomas Cloer
on Events of the last few days at 12:38
David M Taylor
on Two screens or one? at 03:27
Henrik Heigl
on Events of the last few days at 18:51
Sven Scholz
on Two screens or one? at 16:44
Volker Weber
on New poll: how do you expect to be a year from now? at 21:53




