IBM uses self signed SSL certificates?

by Volker Weber

ibmselfsigned

Start using Firefox 3 and you get new insights.

Comments

openssl s_client -connect www-949.ibm.com:443

Tells me the same :-)

Sascha Reissner, 2008-06-18 12:29

FF2 tells you the same thing. Using self signed certs in and of itself is not necessarily a bad thing. Is this a customer facing site?

Kerr Rainey, 2008-06-18 13:18

i thought that Mozilla and Opera and Microsoft agreed on the color scheme for certificate error so users would have the same noticiation.

does it turn red if you continue after the warning ?

Flemming Riis, 2008-06-18 15:31

There is no need to use Firefox 3 to get this not always helpful message. The major problem is that hardly anybody sees and uses the offered hotspot "exception" ! That is the same situation with IE or Opera.....
And that is why companies like Verisign and Thawte have a rather simple and very successful business modell: They just sell the evidence of conformity with certificates stored in browser software.

Claus Bäumler, 2008-06-18 16:16

@Claus: You're correct. In fact, the dialog is technically incorrect - a certificate is not "invalid" simply because it is self-signed. This message is needlessly alarmist.

David Richardson, 2008-06-18 21:08

@David,
its properly considered invalid, because the connection may have been infiltrated by a man-in-the-middle attack.

Only if you would be able to verify the authenticity, it would even provide the higher level of integrity over an official certificate.

Roland Leißl, 2008-06-18 21:35

I agree with David - that the connection may have been infiltrated does not mean that the certificate is invalid. It's good that FF show's its suspicion, but to say the certificate is invalid is just not correct.

Martin Hiegl, 2008-06-18 22:02

From a client perspective, the trustworthiness of certificates rely solely on some bunch of chaining mumbo-jumbo. As roots of some authorities are stored on your system already, only these are considered valid, and so their descendants.

Unlike self-signed certs. They are considered invalid, because no reference is found, unless added to the trust-store manually. This dialog-phrase sure makes sense to users.

Much more important to me: I Heart the new look!

Roland Leißl, 2008-06-18 22:45

Recent comments

Fabian Kruse on Pebble, it was nice knowing you at 18:47
Volker Weber on Pebble, it was nice knowing you at 16:19
Fabian Kruse on Pebble, it was nice knowing you at 16:12
Craig Wiseman on Pebble, it was nice knowing you at 15:17
Mitch Cohen on You may want to turn this off at 14:38
Volker Weber on You may want to turn this off at 14:33
Jochen Kattoll on You may want to turn this off at 14:29
Volker Weber on You may want to turn this off at 13:49
Jochen Kattoll on You may want to turn this off at 13:44
Volker Weber on You may want to turn this off at 13:13
Oliver Regelmann on You may want to turn this off at 11:50
Bill Greenberg on Pebble, it was nice knowing you at 10:48
Volker Weber on You may want to turn this off at 10:43
Johannes Matzke on You may want to turn this off at 10:16
Volker Weber on Pebble, it was nice knowing you at 09:57
Ralph Hammann on Pebble, it was nice knowing you at 09:41
Craig Wiseman on Pebble, it was nice knowing you at 00:37
Volker Weber on Pebble, it was nice knowing you at 23:04
Fabian Kruse on Pebble, it was nice knowing you at 22:54
Hanno Zulla on Pebble, it was nice knowing you at 22:42
Volker Weber on Mal was ganz anderes at 15:34
Armin Grewe on Martin Shelton :: Signal for Beginners at 14:37
Maik Endler on Mal was ganz anderes at 11:36
Volker Weber on Mal was ganz anderes at 23:10
Thomas Merchel on Mal was ganz anderes at 23:05

Ceci n'est pas un blog

I explain difficult concepts in simple ways. For free, and for money. Clue procurement and bullshit detection.

vowe

Contact
Publications
Amazon Wish List
Frequently Asked Questions

rss feed  twitter ello  instagram

Local time is 19:05

visitors.gif