IBM uses self signed SSL certificates?

by Volker Weber

ibmselfsigned

Start using Firefox 3 and you get new insights.

Tags:

Comments

openssl s_client -connect www-949.ibm.com:443

Tells me the same :-)

Sascha Reissner, 2008-06-18 12:29

FF2 tells you the same thing. Using self signed certs in and of itself is not necessarily a bad thing. Is this a customer facing site?

Kerr Rainey, 2008-06-18 13:18

i thought that Mozilla and Opera and Microsoft agreed on the color scheme for certificate error so users would have the same noticiation.

does it turn red if you continue after the warning ?

Flemming Riis, 2008-06-18 15:31

There is no need to use Firefox 3 to get this not always helpful message. The major problem is that hardly anybody sees and uses the offered hotspot "exception" ! That is the same situation with IE or Opera.....
And that is why companies like Verisign and Thawte have a rather simple and very successful business modell: They just sell the evidence of conformity with certificates stored in browser software.

Claus Bäumler, 2008-06-18 16:16

@Claus: You're correct. In fact, the dialog is technically incorrect - a certificate is not "invalid" simply because it is self-signed. This message is needlessly alarmist.

David Richardson, 2008-06-18 21:08

@David,
its properly considered invalid, because the connection may have been infiltrated by a man-in-the-middle attack.

Only if you would be able to verify the authenticity, it would even provide the higher level of integrity over an official certificate.

Roland Leißl, 2008-06-18 21:35

I agree with David - that the connection may have been infiltrated does not mean that the certificate is invalid. It's good that FF show's its suspicion, but to say the certificate is invalid is just not correct.

Martin Hiegl, 2008-06-18 22:02

From a client perspective, the trustworthiness of certificates rely solely on some bunch of chaining mumbo-jumbo. As roots of some authorities are stored on your system already, only these are considered valid, and so their descendants.

Unlike self-signed certs. They are considered invalid, because no reference is found, unless added to the trust-store manually. This dialog-phrase sure makes sense to users.

Much more important to me: I Heart the new look!

Roland Leißl, 2008-06-18 22:45

Recent comments

Lino Helms on iPhone 6 NFC chip is restricted to Apple Pay at 15:29
Franz Mattes on Mittagsspaziergang at 06:52
Eric Hancock on iPhone 6 NFC chip is restricted to Apple Pay at 04:32
Ingo Seifert on iPhone 6 NFC chip is restricted to Apple Pay at 00:24
Ingo Seifert on iPhone 6 NFC chip is restricted to Apple Pay at 23:38
Andrew Magerman on iPhone 6 NFC chip is restricted to Apple Pay at 16:34
Volker Weber on iPhone 6 NFC chip is restricted to Apple Pay at 15:38
Craig Wiseman on iPhone 6 NFC chip is restricted to Apple Pay at 15:28
Eric Bredtmann on iPhone 6 NFC chip is restricted to Apple Pay at 14:17
Johannes Matzke on iPhone 6 NFC chip is restricted to Apple Pay at 12:45
Volker Weber on iPhone 6 NFC chip is restricted to Apple Pay at 09:07
Ole Saalmann on iPhone 6 NFC chip is restricted to Apple Pay at 09:04
Stefan Funke on Why Would Anybody Buy an Apple Watch? at 22:08
Maik Endler on Withings at 20:51
Volker Weber on I bet you did not see this coming from BlackBerry at 14:28
Roland Dressler on A Watch Guy's Thoughts On The Apple Watch After Seeing It In The Metal at 14:24
Karl Heindel on I bet you did not see this coming from BlackBerry at 13:18
Oliver Regelmann on I bet you did not see this coming from BlackBerry at 11:47
Dragon Cotterill on I bet you did not see this coming from BlackBerry at 10:39
Ralph Hammann on I bet you did not see this coming from BlackBerry at 10:13
Abdelkader Boui on I bet you did not see this coming from BlackBerry at 22:55
Volker Weber on I bet you did not see this coming from BlackBerry at 22:35
Bodo Menke on I bet you did not see this coming from BlackBerry at 22:28
Abdelkader Boui on I bet you did not see this coming from BlackBerry at 22:01
Ingo Seifert on Mittagsspaziergang at 21:29

Ceci n'est pas un blog

vowe.net is a personal website published by Volker Weber a.k.a. vowe. I am an author, consultant and systems architect based in Darmstadt, Germany.

rss Click here to subscribe

Hello

About me
Contact
Publications
Certificates
Amazon Wish List
Frequently Asked Questions
Follow @vowe on Twitter

Local time is 01:36

visitors.gif

Tip jar

Archives

As most of my articles roll off the front page rather quickly, I am making an archive of previous posts available here. You can also use the handy search box at the top of the page if you are looking for something particular.

Last 30 days
More archives

Mobile tag for this page

© 1992-2014 Volker Weber.
All Rights Reserved.

Impressum