IBM uses self signed SSL certificates?

by Volker Weber

ibmselfsigned

Start using Firefox 3 and you get new insights.

Comments

openssl s_client -connect www-949.ibm.com:443

Tells me the same :-)

Sascha Reissner, 2008-06-18 12:29

FF2 tells you the same thing. Using self signed certs in and of itself is not necessarily a bad thing. Is this a customer facing site?

Kerr Rainey, 2008-06-18 13:18

i thought that Mozilla and Opera and Microsoft agreed on the color scheme for certificate error so users would have the same noticiation.

does it turn red if you continue after the warning ?

Flemming Riis, 2008-06-18 15:31

There is no need to use Firefox 3 to get this not always helpful message. The major problem is that hardly anybody sees and uses the offered hotspot "exception" ! That is the same situation with IE or Opera.....
And that is why companies like Verisign and Thawte have a rather simple and very successful business modell: They just sell the evidence of conformity with certificates stored in browser software.

Claus Bäumler, 2008-06-18 16:16

@Claus: You're correct. In fact, the dialog is technically incorrect - a certificate is not "invalid" simply because it is self-signed. This message is needlessly alarmist.

David Richardson, 2008-06-18 21:08

@David,
its properly considered invalid, because the connection may have been infiltrated by a man-in-the-middle attack.

Only if you would be able to verify the authenticity, it would even provide the higher level of integrity over an official certificate.

Roland Leißl, 2008-06-18 21:35

I agree with David - that the connection may have been infiltrated does not mean that the certificate is invalid. It's good that FF show's its suspicion, but to say the certificate is invalid is just not correct.

Martin Hiegl, 2008-06-18 22:02

From a client perspective, the trustworthiness of certificates rely solely on some bunch of chaining mumbo-jumbo. As roots of some authorities are stored on your system already, only these are considered valid, and so their descendants.

Unlike self-signed certs. They are considered invalid, because no reference is found, unless added to the trust-store manually. This dialog-phrase sure makes sense to users.

Much more important to me: I Heart the new look!

Roland Leißl, 2008-06-18 22:45

Recent comments

Owen Menck on Restart completed at 00:42
Rod Stauffer on Restart completed at 00:11
Oliver Busse on Restart completed at 23:20
John Keys on Restart completed at 22:27
Craig Wiseman on Restart completed at 21:28
Michael Urspringer on Restart completed at 21:26
Thomas Lang on Restart completed at 20:51
Armin Auth on Restart completed at 19:54
Abdelkader Boui on Restart completed at 19:34
Andrew Magerman on Dramatische 24 Stunden at 18:12
Stefanie Wörtche on Dramatische 24 Stunden at 09:48
Olaf Thormählen on From my inbox at 09:15
Michael Reibold on Dramatische 24 Stunden at 09:03
Francie Tanner on Dramatische 24 Stunden at 08:53
Volker Weber on Dramatische 24 Stunden at 05:30
Axel von Dielingen on Dramatische 24 Stunden at 04:44
HaJo Gurt on Dramatische 24 Stunden at 23:40
Anneliese Wasserer on Dramatische 24 Stunden at 23:38
Thomas Mendorf on Dramatische 24 Stunden at 22:34
Volker Weber on Dramatische 24 Stunden at 21:40
Detlev Neuenhoff on Dramatische 24 Stunden at 21:38
Jan Tietze on Dramatische 24 Stunden at 20:53
Ken Bisconti on Dramatische 24 Stunden at 20:19
Lukas Gerlich on Dramatische 24 Stunden at 20:06
Mike Hartmann on Dramatische 24 Stunden at 17:42

Ceci n'est pas un blog

I explain difficult concepts in simple ways. For free, and for money. Clue procurement and bullshit detection.

vowe

Contact
Publications
Amazon Wish List
Frequently Asked Questions

rss feed  twitter

Local time is 05:18

visitors.gif