IBM uses self signed SSL certificates?

by Volker Weber

ibmselfsigned

Start using Firefox 3 and you get new insights.

Comments

openssl s_client -connect www-949.ibm.com:443

Tells me the same :-)

Sascha Reissner, 2008-06-18 12:29

FF2 tells you the same thing. Using self signed certs in and of itself is not necessarily a bad thing. Is this a customer facing site?

Kerr Rainey, 2008-06-18 13:18

i thought that Mozilla and Opera and Microsoft agreed on the color scheme for certificate error so users would have the same noticiation.

does it turn red if you continue after the warning ?

Flemming Riis, 2008-06-18 15:31

There is no need to use Firefox 3 to get this not always helpful message. The major problem is that hardly anybody sees and uses the offered hotspot "exception" ! That is the same situation with IE or Opera.....
And that is why companies like Verisign and Thawte have a rather simple and very successful business modell: They just sell the evidence of conformity with certificates stored in browser software.

Claus Bäumler, 2008-06-18 16:16

@Claus: You're correct. In fact, the dialog is technically incorrect - a certificate is not "invalid" simply because it is self-signed. This message is needlessly alarmist.

David Richardson, 2008-06-18 21:08

@David,
its properly considered invalid, because the connection may have been infiltrated by a man-in-the-middle attack.

Only if you would be able to verify the authenticity, it would even provide the higher level of integrity over an official certificate.

Roland Leißl, 2008-06-18 21:35

I agree with David - that the connection may have been infiltrated does not mean that the certificate is invalid. It's good that FF show's its suspicion, but to say the certificate is invalid is just not correct.

Martin Hiegl, 2008-06-18 22:02

From a client perspective, the trustworthiness of certificates rely solely on some bunch of chaining mumbo-jumbo. As roots of some authorities are stored on your system already, only these are considered valid, and so their descendants.

Unlike self-signed certs. They are considered invalid, because no reference is found, unless added to the trust-store manually. This dialog-phrase sure makes sense to users.

Much more important to me: I Heart the new look!

Roland Leißl, 2008-06-18 22:45

Recent comments

Ian Bradbury on Is Slack a product or a feature? at 17:36
Keith brooks on Is Slack a product or a feature? at 15:23
Bill Brown on Samsung Galaxy S8 :: The verdict at 18:57
Richard Schwartz on Samsung Galaxy S8 :: The verdict at 16:01
Andy Dennis on Is Slack a product or a feature? at 16:00
Karl Heindel on Marshall Monitor BT at 15:32
Martin Funk on Is Slack a product or a feature? at 15:02
Volker Weber on Marshall Monitor BT at 11:25
Karl Heindel on Marshall Monitor BT at 11:21
Michael Klüsener on Is Slack a product or a feature? at 09:14
Patrick Bohr on Is Slack a product or a feature? at 19:56
Frank Quednau on Is Slack a product or a feature? at 18:02
Thomas Klein on Samsung Galaxy S8 :: The verdict at 15:46
Volker Weber on Samsung Galaxy S8 :: The verdict at 11:34
Patrick Bohr on Samsung Galaxy S8 :: The verdict at 08:51
Felix Binsack on Samsung Galaxy S8 :: The verdict at 16:49
Volker Weber on Samsung Galaxy S8 :: First impressions at 14:01
Volker Weber on Marshall Monitor BT at 13:59
Scott Hanson on Marshall Monitor BT at 13:23
Norbert Tretkowski on Samsung Galaxy S8 :: First impressions at 09:44
Volker Weber on Marshall Monitor BT at 19:50
Richard Schwartz on Marshall Monitor BT at 18:50
Bernd Hofmann on Marshall Monitor BT at 15:01
Ingo Müller on BlackBerry stumbles over April security fix at 22:22
Volker Weber on Samsung Galaxy S8 :: First impressions at 20:07

Ceci n'est pas un blog

I explain difficult concepts in simple ways. For free, and for money. Clue procurement and bullshit detection.

vowe

Contact
Publications
Amazon Wish List
Frequently Asked Questions

rss feed  twitter  instagram

Local time is 01:23

visitors.gif