Revenues from the WebSphere family of software products ... increased 17 percent year over year. Revenues from Information Management software... increased 7 percent. Revenues from Tivoli software ... increased 18 percent, and revenues from Lotus software ... decreased 6 percent. Revenues from Rational software ... increased 1 percent.
Follow this chain for the last quarters.
Borrowing from basketball, you can't win by playing defense (even though that is important), you have to put the ball in the hoop.
Damn. Well, they didn't blow the money on Marketing, for sure.
And yes. Defence. Not a winning strategy.
Lotus down 6 percent? Despite all those license sales in New Zealand? I blame codestore.net.
as an IBM executive, I can't ever directly comment on earnings or financial performance. I wish I could, as a community you all deserve to understand this number more. But the US SEC has definite ideas about how publicly-traded companies discuss financials.
2010 has been a pretty busy year. Some losses, but some wins. Lotus held its market share vs. Microsoft according to IDC's report just last month. (No, I can't quote those numbers either, since that's IDC's property). The volume of sales activity I've personally participated in so far this year has been more than any of the last three or four years, which includes the time that I was the Notes product sales executive.
I promise that in the weeks ahead, you'll hear about some wins and interesting decisions in the Notes/Domino direction. We'll also launch LotusLive Notes, which takes everything that is goodness about Domino and brings it to the cloud, in a very cool way. And then there's Symphony 3, Project "Concord", Connections 3, more LotusLive stuff, Quickr Domino 8.5, Project "Northstar", and more.
I'll be blunt, I hate having to dance around this. It makes me dizzy. But there is a lot of good happening now too.
And all that time and effort spent marketing LotusLive... Maybe its time to start focusing on retaining the big in sourced businesses again.
One question I'd be interested in, and I know I probably won't get the real answer, is how that WebSphere revenue is really being reported.
Based on how things are aligned, all Portal sales should be credited under the Lotus column. I'd not be surprised if they're showing up in WebSphere.
Not saying that would fix the 6% but it would still be an interesting look. Either way would be perfectly fine in terms of Software Group. Anything that says WebSphere would go there, regardless of the underlying alignment.
Heck, look at how Power Systems revenue was recognized up till this year. The numbers weren't being placed into the columns they should have been in reality, but they worked just fine legally.
Of course I could be totally and entirely wrong, but I have to question it.
Kevin, I believe WebSphere Portal is being credited to WPLC, the internal name for Lotus. So that is already accounted for in the minus 6 %.
This old saying comes to mind while I watch IBM cannibalize it's license business to follow the "cloud" option.
"Throwing the baby out with the bath water".
Volker Weber on Sonos: Musik von einem Raum in einen anderen verschieben at 14:16
Manfred Wiktorin on Sonos: Musik von einem Raum in einen anderen verschieben at 13:44
Johannes Koch on Sonos: Musik von einem Raum in einen anderen verschieben at 12:58
Ingo Spichal on Sonos: Musik von einem Raum in einen anderen verschieben at 10:40
Franz Mattes on Microsoft Office for Mac at 10:17
Volker Weber on Microsoft Office finally with Retina Support at 08:36
Frank Quednau on Microsoft Office for Mac at 07:55
Frank Quednau on This tweet became relevant for Mac users at 07:52
Scott Hanson on It was nice knowing you, Google+ at 07:15
Michael Sampson on Michael Sampson :: Insights on Adoption Vol. 2 at 03:13
Andy Mell on Limited Edition Sonos PLAY: 1 Blue Note at 01:05
Andy Mell on Microsoft Office finally with Retina Support at 00:59
Andreas Schödl on This tweet became relevant for Mac users at 21:47
Sven Bühler on Limited Edition Sonos PLAY: 1 Blue Note at 21:25
Ed Brill on This tweet became relevant for Mac users at 19:12
Ben Poole on Forget PCs. The Real Bloatware Problem Is on Android at 13:54
Michael Klüsener on Limited Edition Sonos PLAY: 1 Blue Note at 13:51
Patrick Bohr on Forget PCs. The Real Bloatware Problem Is on Android at 11:20
Thomas Lang on Love has no label at 08:41
Kai Schmalenbach on Forget PCs. The Real Bloatware Problem Is on Android at 01:19
Max Nierbauer on Forget PCs. The Real Bloatware Problem Is on Android at 23:39
Alan Lepofsky on Forget PCs. The Real Bloatware Problem Is on Android at 21:08
Ingo Seifert on Love has no label at 21:06
Nils Michael Becker on Kann so weitergehen at 20:23
Ray Bilyk on Forget PCs. The Real Bloatware Problem Is on Android at 19:21