I'm a dog

by Volker Weber

I don't believe in astrology but this is a pretty good description:

People born in the Year of the Dog possess the best traits of human nature. They have a deep sense of loyalty, are honest, and inspire other people's confidence because they know how to keep secrets. But Dog People are somewhat selfish, terribly stubborn, and eccentric. They care little for wealth, yet somehow always seem to have money. They can be cold emotionally and sometimes distant at parties. They can find fault with many things and are noted for their sharp tongues. Dog people make good leaders.

Comments

I'm a Horse myself, and it's pretty spot-on accurate for me.

Chris Toohey, 2007-08-16

Well, I’m a rat, and I’d say almost all of the write-up is way off the mark :-D
People born in the Year of the Rat are noted for their charm and attraction for the opposite sex. They work hard to achieve their goals, acquire possessions, and are likely to be perfectionists. They are basically thrifty with money. Rat people are easily angered and love to gossip. Their ambitions are big, and they are usually very successful. They are most compatible with people born in the years of the Dragon, Monkey, and Ox.

Ben Poole, 2007-08-16

I am a Rooster:

People born in the Year of the Rooster are deep thinkers, capable, and talented. They like to be busy and are devoted beyond their capabilities and are deeply disappointed if they fail. People born in the Rooster Year are often a bit eccentric, and often have rather difficult relationship with others. They always think they are right and usually are! They frequently are loners and though they give the outward impression of being adventurous, they are timid. Rooster peopleˇ¦s emotions like their fortunes, swing very high to very low. They can be selfish and too outspoken, but are always interesting and can be extremely brave. They are most compatible with Ox, Snake, and Dragon.

Hmm, I think that is fairly accurate...

Karl-Henry Martinsson, 2007-08-16

snake here. it's pretty close, but there are some differences. i've always thought there was something to the chinese zodiac. it's awfully strange. really makes you wonder how they came up with it.

but there seems to always be at least one note that is off.

for instance, not everyone born in the year 1965 could possibly be good looking. i mean, that is statistically very unlikely. in my case i'm not exactly a model of physical perfection. or AM i???? but a lot of the other traits are definitely me.

John Vaughan, 2007-08-16

The Rooster fits very well... though that's not necessarily a good thing ;-)

Frank Dröge, 2007-08-16

Hmmm... I'm a rabbit. Does that make me fluffy?

Paul Mooney, 2007-08-16

Ssssnake.

Cem Basman, 2007-08-16

Volker - I knew we've got someting in common. Now I know what it is.
Keep secrets, sharp tongue .....

Wuff!

Karsten Kunert, 2007-08-16

"People born in the Year of the Rat are noted for their charm and attraction for the opposite sex. "

Both does not realy fit to me :-(

Wolfgang Schmidetzki, 2007-08-17

Now i know why im sometimes sitting at the window howling to the moon.....

Jens Jeschke, 2007-08-17

Joining the snake club. I always knew Cem and I are good looking. :-D

Philipp Sury, 2007-08-17

Recent comments

Nils Michael Becker on satellite für Android ist fertig at 09:36
Stefan Brandl on May Android Updates :: Samsung wins again at 21:03
Manfred Wiktorin on May Android Updates :: Samsung wins again at 20:33
Roland Dressler on How to make boring software look sexy :: Exhibit 1 Microsoft at 13:13
Hubert Stettner on May Android Updates :: Samsung wins again at 12:40
Hubert Stettner on How to make boring software look sexy :: Exhibit 1 Microsoft at 12:39
David Guillaume on May Android Updates :: Samsung wins again at 12:03
Lars Berntrop-Bos on May Android Updates :: Samsung wins again at 11:54
Martin Kautz on Externe SSD mit USB-C für aktuell 88 Euro at 11:07
Volker Weber on May Android Updates :: Samsung wins again at 10:36
Felix Kluge on May Android Updates :: Samsung wins again at 10:35
Thomas Cloer on Vipp 501 :: From my inbox at 10:12
Manfred Wiktorin on satellite für Android ist fertig at 10:05
Markus Heyl on Typ-2-Diabetes lässt sich wohl wieder zurückdrängen #dontbreakthechain at 09:51
Volker Weber on satellite für Android ist fertig at 09:44
Dirk Hagedorn on satellite für Android ist fertig at 09:43
Sami Bahri on No Limits at 07:12
Nick Coenen on No Limits at 02:58
Robert Schneider on Typ-2-Diabetes lässt sich wohl wieder zurückdrängen #dontbreakthechain at 18:28
Armin Grewe on Yancey Strickler :: The Internet is Becoming a Dark Forest at 17:44
Till Nachtmann on Yancey Strickler :: The Internet is Becoming a Dark Forest at 16:33
Volker Weber on Yancey Strickler :: The Internet is Becoming a Dark Forest at 15:22
Volker Weber on If you build barriers, people will build around you. If you are lucky. at 15:07
Armin Grewe on Yancey Strickler :: The Internet is Becoming a Dark Forest at 11:28
Theo Heselmans on If you build barriers, people will build around you. If you are lucky. at 11:13

Ceci n'est pas un blog

I explain difficult concepts in simple ways. For free, and for money. Clue procurement and bullshit detection.

vowe

Contact
Publications
Stuff that works
Amazon Wish List
Frequently Asked Questions

rss feed  twitter  amazon

Local time is 13:47

visitors.gif

buy me coffee

Paypal vowe