Instead of the complicated, confusing mess of a ringtone policy that Apple announced last week, what they should have announced is this: "Any song you can play on your iPhone can be used as a ringtone for no additional charge. Want a new ringtone? Just buy it from iTunes or rip it from a CD."
That's how it works with all the other phones.
Repeat after me: DRM is bad for the customer.
The ringtone racket is, to me, the absolute epitome of an arrogant industry taking advantage of a gullible consumer base.
If I ever pay a dime for something that does nothing more than advertise some else's product every time my phone rings in a desperate attempt to be cool in a twisted doppelganger teenaged way -- someone just kill me on the spot.
The mobile phone ringtone / wallpaper / screensaver industry is massive with kids in the UK. I don’t understand it at all—why pay for any of that? I must be getting old :o)
Actually, what is even worse:
You can't use ringtones you did in GarageBand. That would be a very nice menu entry in GB: "Send to iPhone as ringtone". :-)
Ben, looks like Andrew is older than you. ;-)
Come on guys, let's put this into perspective:
- when you buy an iPhone, you know the limitations. There are (feature wise) *many* better phones for less money
- the ringtones stuff only pays off for Apple if there are enough gullible customers. Looking at the ringtone business in general, and comparing how many people buy into spam - that seems a totally valid move to me. Apple is a public company and needs to make money. If the market tells them it doesn't work, they'll change.
- so far, hacks to circumvent Apple's DRM have always turned up sooner or later. That's not saying DRM is ok, but it's still not quite as bad as with other vendors (reminds me I need to download the latest QTFairUse6.cfg.. ;) )
Still, DRM is bad. But it's where you put *YOUR* money, so chose wisely.
May I ask an off topic question?! :)
What software can be used to create backup images for Mac Hardware? Software should support backups to NAS.
CCC is the tool of choice: http://www.bombich.com/software/ccc.html
Make sure to check out his how-to guides. Also note, that you can boot a mac from an external disk. So make a second install of Mac OS X on an external disk and you can boot a Mac without locking the internal disk.
Looks interesting. I will test this. Thanks.
CCC is the tool of choice
Not all seem to agree with this recommendation. Depending on how complete you wish the image to be "SuperDuper!" is also highly recommended. While it is commercial software you can use its basic features (cloning) for free.
I don't know if "SuperDuper!" will work with a NAS.
Not back-up related, but I can recommend SuperDuper for something else.
Last month I needed to resurrect the old iMac G4 when it refused to boot from either its internal drive or CD / DVD. I used SuperDuper to create a boot-able OS on my external Firewire drive, and was able to get the iMac up and running again from that.
How Apple Had to Backtrack on Ringtones thanks to RIAA "The bottom line, however, is that Apple did the best it could to protect the interest of their customers and still comply with copyright law."
Music and Movie copyright mess is not as bad as software patents, but
ibid: "DRM is bad for the customer"
P.S.: I have used CCC for bootable clones, Deja vu (only because included with Toast) for nightly backup on the PowerMac and SilverKeeper (free from La Cie) for ad hoc laptop backups.
While the RIAA won the right to not pay performers royalties for ringtones, it simultaneously maintained the right to collect the monies for those ringtones.
And I thought, it was all about the artists.
PS: Do I need to put in the irony tags?
The latest version 3.0 of CCC was just released. It seems to have changed under the hood and might deserve a closer look.
Gordon Inkson on Is Slack a product or a feature? at 03:22
Ian Bradbury on Is Slack a product or a feature? at 17:36
Keith brooks on Is Slack a product or a feature? at 15:23
Bill Brown on Samsung Galaxy S8 :: The verdict at 18:57
Richard Schwartz on Samsung Galaxy S8 :: The verdict at 16:01
Andy Dennis on Is Slack a product or a feature? at 16:00
Karl Heindel on Marshall Monitor BT at 15:32
Martin Funk on Is Slack a product or a feature? at 15:02
Volker Weber on Marshall Monitor BT at 11:25
Karl Heindel on Marshall Monitor BT at 11:21
Michael Klüsener on Is Slack a product or a feature? at 09:14
Patrick Bohr on Is Slack a product or a feature? at 19:56
Frank Quednau on Is Slack a product or a feature? at 18:02
Thomas Klein on Samsung Galaxy S8 :: The verdict at 15:46
Volker Weber on Samsung Galaxy S8 :: The verdict at 11:34
Patrick Bohr on Samsung Galaxy S8 :: The verdict at 08:51
Felix Binsack on Samsung Galaxy S8 :: The verdict at 16:49
Volker Weber on Samsung Galaxy S8 :: First impressions at 14:01
Volker Weber on Marshall Monitor BT at 13:59
Scott Hanson on Marshall Monitor BT at 13:23
Norbert Tretkowski on Samsung Galaxy S8 :: First impressions at 09:44
Volker Weber on Marshall Monitor BT at 19:50
Richard Schwartz on Marshall Monitor BT at 18:50
Bernd Hofmann on Marshall Monitor BT at 15:01
Ingo Müller on BlackBerry stumbles over April security fix at 22:22