Are airport X-ray scanners harmful?

by Volker Weber

While the risk of getting a fatal cancer from the screening is minuscule, it's about equal to the probability that an airplane will get blown up by a terrorist, he added. "So my view is there is not a case to be made for deploying them to prevent such a low probability event."

More >

Comments

If you don't mind my two cents, Discover Magazine has a better overall article:

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2010/11/17/whats-the-real-radiation-risk-of-the-tsas-full-body-x-ray-scans/

I am concerned about the risk of skin cancer (esp. because I live at high altitude here, 7500'). For a healthy person, this type of x-ray scan would be little or no risk. We have a lot of people here with precancerous lesions from exposure to UV, and I have a feeling frequent exposure to x-rays via these scanners would cause an early, measurable increase in malignant skin cancers. And give our less-reputable papers endless amounts of "death by governmental bureaucracy" stories to run.

If you hit the final paragraphs of that article, you'll see that radio frequency millimeter-wave scanners would avoid all this, if they standardized on that technology. Irresponsible, really, to risk our health when a suitable equivalent exists (and is even in deployment).

The nude/prude issue will still fill the airwaves, however.

Note, emotions are running very high over this issue here in America, esp. for parents who have to allow their children to fly to school, summer camps, etc. etc. Noone wants to see their daughter's scan as an internet pin-up. I'm seeing verbal arguments pro/con all over Facebook.

Apparently [according to my brief five minute's research] the TSA's training runs about 40 hours, with 60 hours of on the job training. The question's being asked ... are these people really *qualified* to do this kind of thing? X-ray technicians in hospitals have to attend school for years, as a comparison. The nature of the job isn't equivalent, but the question of scanner calibration, respect for privacy, professionalism, etc. etc. is valid. I read that new technologies are being rolled out to already-trained technicians, and there are not enough resources or trained personnel to bring them up to speed on proper operation.

Garret P. Vreeland, 2010-11-18

Recent comments

Volker Weber on Sonos hat ein Leak-Problem at 17:08
Jochen Schug on Sonos hat ein Leak-Problem at 16:37
Martin Imbeck on On productivity and collaboration at 14:00
Volker Weber on Sonos hat ein Leak-Problem at 12:30
Stephan Wissel on On productivity and collaboration at 12:27
Matthias Welling on Fritz!OS 7.12 at 11:58
Johannes Koch on Sonos hat ein Leak-Problem at 11:53
Jochen Schug on Neue Apple Watch at 09:28
Johannes Matzke on Sonos hat ein Leak-Problem at 07:45
Dirk Steins on Sonos hat ein Leak-Problem at 07:30
Hubert Stettner on Neue Apple Watch at 21:31
Ole Saalmann on Neue Apple Watch at 18:29
Bernd Hofmann on Ted Chiang :: Exhalation #nowreading at 16:48
Tobias Hauser on Neue Apple Watch at 15:18
Volker Weber on Ted Chiang :: Exhalation #nowreading at 12:57
Dirk Steins on Ted Chiang :: Exhalation #nowreading at 12:51
Ragnar Schierholz on Fritz!OS 7.12 at 22:46
Kai Pahl on Amazon - Wenn Logistik perfekt funktioniert at 16:29
Michael Gaul on Amazon - Wenn Logistik perfekt funktioniert at 15:35
Hubert Stettner on Fritz!OS 7.12 at 07:40
Volker Weber on Fritz!OS 7.12 at 06:45
Hubert Stettner on Fritz!OS 7.12 at 06:39
Volker Weber on Amazon - Wenn Logistik perfekt funktioniert at 21:50
Felix Binsack on Amazon - Wenn Logistik perfekt funktioniert at 21:46
Volker Weber on ThinkPad X1 Yoga :: Lenovo liefert nicht at 21:39

Ceci n'est pas un blog

I explain difficult concepts in simple ways. For free, and for money. Clue procurement and bullshit detection.

vowe

Contact
Publications
Stuff that works
Amazon Wish List
Frequently Asked Questions

rss feed  twitter  amazon

Local time is 05:25

visitors.gif

buy me coffee

Paypal vowe