Nokia 808 PureView vs. iPhone 4S Sample Photos

by Volker Weber

I took both the 808 PureView and the iPhone 4S on one of my bike tours and shot a few photos on each camera. They were both on full automatic. In this mode the iPhone shoots 8 MP images and the PureView is in 5 MP 16:9 mode. I used digital lossless zoom in a few sample images on the PureView, and I shot one image in full resolution.

I chose full automatic mode because (a) Nokia recommends the 5MP PureView mode for best results and (b) since I don't want to ruin photos with the wrong settings. As I get more accustomed to the 808, I will use some of the artistic features.

PureView samples >
iPhone samples >

Update: As night falls, the differences become a lot more apparent. PureView left, iPhone right.

   

Comments

I didn't zoom into a 1:1 pixel peeping mode, but from afar images from both cameras look good to me.

Clearly in most photos the iPhone uses settings that most users would subjectively like more. Specifically more contrast and more vivid colors. But that doesn't say much about the camera I think. And as a result of more contrast you can see less detail in shadows of the iPhone's images.

In photo 8 (boats) you can see that the iPhone' exposure automatic does a better job. It uses a shorter exposure time (or similar) to capture more detail.

There is only one photo which really turns the whole thing upside down. In photo 17 (train shed) the iPhone's image is less vivid, with lower contrast than the PureView's one. Did you smudge the lens?

Mariano Kamp, 2012-06-12

No, the lens is clean. The iPhone is also more aggressive sharpening the photo. The PureView files are much smaller and differ more in size. Less noise.

I agree with you, that both sets look "good enough" for me. This will change when I venture into deeper water. The PureView has a powerful flash for instance.

Volker Weber, 2012-06-12

I appreciate the comparisons. As my current phone (E71) reaches the end of its life, I find myself looking at phones that will also be my primary camera. Obvious choices are the iPhone and possibly the PureView. Based on what I see, the 808 does take marginally nicer shots. I look forward to seeing some examples with the flash.

Andy Reimer, 2012-06-12

For my eyes, the Nokia produces more vivid colors. Sharpness seems better on the iPhone (I also suppose more aggressive sharpening).
On high ISO settings, the Nokia is a clear winner, that's obvious.
But both are quite capable cameras I think.

What about handling - autofocus speed and shutter lag on the Nokia?

A comparison with the Samsung Galaxy S3 would be interesting.

Sven Bühler, 2012-06-12

Handling is pretty good. You can either use it in full automatic, go to scenes mode, where you tell it generally what you are looking at, or you can go full manual with three custom settings you can quickly change.

Once you are focused, there is no shutter lag. Zoom is instant since it's digital without interpolation. I have not made up my mind about focusing speed. I need to shoot a few hundred frames before I can come to a conclusion. With this capable shooter probably a lot more. It feels very natural so far.

The big question remains: is the iPhone 4S good enough? It's a much tighter package with broad software support. While Symbian Belle FP1 is really nice, it's clearly a dead end.

In bright daylight I see no real benefit in the PureView besides a wider view angle and 16:9 without crop. As soon as you go indoors or shoot at night, it's no competition. This is where the PureView leaves the iPhone in the dust.

And we have not talked about videos in concert setups. Full HD with digital lossless zoom and microphone that can capture 140 db could provide for some great footage.

Volker Weber, 2012-06-13

Handling is pretty good. You can either use it in full automatic, go to scenes mode, where you tell it generally what you are looking at, or you can go full manual with three custom settings you can quickly change.

Once you are focused, there is no shutter lag. Zoom is instant since it's digital without interpolation. I have not made up my mind about focusing speed. I need to shoot a few hundred frames before I can come to a conclusion. With this capable shooter probably a lot more. It feels very natural so far.

The big question remains: is the iPhone 4S good enough? It's a much tighter package with broad software support. While Symbian Belle FP1 is really nice, it's clearly a dead end.

In bright daylight I see no real benefit in the PureView besides a wider view angle and 16:9 without crop. As soon as you go indoors or shoot at night, it's no competition. This is where the PureView leaves the iPhone in the dust.

And we have not talked about videos in concert setups. Full HD with digital lossless zoom and microphone that can capture 140 db could provide for some great footage.

Volker Weber, 2012-06-13

The 808 is much better, especialliy in imaging and video recording and as an fully-fledged multimedia device!

Ante Gotovina, 2012-06-13

Wau! The low light performance on the 808 is amazing!

If you have time it would be interesting to set the contrast and sharpness parameters on the 808 to match the iPhone’s and see comparisons between those pics as well.

Good stuff! Can’t wait to get my hands on the 808!

Peter Grahan, 2012-06-15

Recent comments

Volker Weber on Fritz!Fon C4, C5 und C6 :: Stuff that works at 23:17
Ragnar Schierholz on Fritz!Fon C4, C5 und C6 :: Stuff that works at 23:08
Jan Fuellemann on ANC Schalter für Beats Studio 3 in iOS 13 at 17:10
Volker Weber on Recording video on iPhone with Buetooth headset at 00:01
Gregory Engels on Recording video on iPhone with Buetooth headset at 22:41
Martin Hiegl on Cryptodamages: Monetary value estimates of the air pollution and human health impacts of cryptocurrency mining at 17:45
Markus Dierker on Recording video on iPhone with Buetooth headset at 08:25
Volker Weber on Cryptodamages: Monetary value estimates of the air pollution and human health impacts of cryptocurrency mining at 22:48
Maximilian von Hulewicz on Cryptodamages: Monetary value estimates of the air pollution and human health impacts of cryptocurrency mining at 08:09
Andreas Weinreich on Withings ECG :: Erste Eindrücke at 21:30
Andy Mell on Very fast October update for Galaxy S10 at 18:56
Volker Weber on Withings ECG :: Erste Eindrücke at 16:53
Bernd Fellerhoff on Withings ECG :: Erste Eindrücke at 15:23
Stanislaus Landeis on iCloud Drive file sharing delayed until spring 2020 at 12:55
Volker Weber on AirPlay 2 richtig verwenden at 11:52
Matthias Welling on AirPlay 2 richtig verwenden at 09:30
Volker Weber on AirPlay 2 richtig verwenden at 23:10
Steve Smillie on Very fast October update for Galaxy S10 at 21:58
Ragnar Schierholz on AirPlay 2 richtig verwenden at 21:34
Ragnar Schierholz on Withings ECG :: Erste Eindrücke at 18:05
Peter Meuser on Endlich habe ich Samsung DeX kapiert at 17:00
Torsten Pinkert on Very fast October update for Galaxy S10 at 16:45
Christian Tillmanns on Cryptodamages: Monetary value estimates of the air pollution and human health impacts of cryptocurrency mining at 16:17
Armin Auth on Lenovo Chromebook C340-11 #stuffthatworks at 11:49
Maximilian von Hulewicz on Cryptodamages: Monetary value estimates of the air pollution and human health impacts of cryptocurrency mining at 10:06

Ceci n'est pas un blog

I explain difficult concepts in simple ways. For free, and for money. Clue procurement and bullshit detection.

vowe

Contact
Publications
Stuff that works
Amazon Wish List
Frequently Asked Questions

rss feed  twitter  amazon

Local time is 06:46

visitors.gif

buy me coffee

Paypal vowe