Important Update on IBM Verse Preview Service

by Volker Weber

ZZ6D8A8DA3

Why does IBM store my password in a way that it could be exposed? And how are you supposed to trust a cloud service with holes this size? Let's investigate what we can find out from this email:

we were made aware that an error existed in our user authentication process that temporarily made user registration information potentially accessible to other users of the service

Somebody found this hole and told IBM. The hole is in the onboarding service. That's the one that could have taken a day, remember? From the outside, this looks like IBM is taking the form with everything you enter, name, password, mail address, phone number etc. and does not safely create a directory entry where the password would be hashed. Instead this is put into a queue to be processed later, maybe somewhere else. Going out on a limb here, somebody may have found out that he could dump that queue onto his computer.

What really bothers me: I have rolled out big a$$ services myself. And there were security reviews out of the wazoo for this kind of process before you could take it live. Never in your life would you have survived with a design that stores passwords in clear text.

Does. Not. Compute.

ZZ5D9D80BE

Comments

and this is why I am glad I have switched to only using unique passwords generated by Lastpass

Not the first site to be bitten by something like this and certainly not the last

Mitch Cohen , 2015-03-13 22:18

IBM tries very hard to proof that cloud services are not ready for the Enterprise. IBM Verse users cannot use the browser they want. Passwords and other sensitive data is accessable by other users. And when there is a problem the whole service will be shut down with no backup. We will stay on premise as long as it is possible.

Ralf M Petter, 2015-03-13 22:22

Your Verse password is not stored in a way that could be exposed. It's stored like any other Domino HTTP password as a salted hash that has been market-tested for over a decade.

IBM was extremely responsive to the notification of the vulnerability in the registration process. Instead of getting defensive they shut down the registration service entirely, and notified registrants of a potential vulnerability which only affected a tiny fraction (about 25) of the total users.

Nathan T. Freeman, 2015-03-13 22:40

Interesting, Nathan. IBM knows those 25 users? And why do I need to change the password elsewhere if only a salted hash exists?

Volker Weber, 2015-03-13 22:41

It's like the pinnacle of incompetence.

Daniel Haferkorn, 2015-03-13 23:04

I don't know whether they've identified the fraction. They could have. And they probably could have just notified that fraction, but they chose to apply the notification broadly instead.

Verse itself only has salted password hashes, but the preview registration process is not the same as Verse itself. (From an implementation standpoint, at least. I realize they're perceived by the customer as one.)

Nathan T. Freeman, 2015-03-13 23:12

"Verse itself only has salted password hashes, but the preview registration process is not the same as Verse itself." - That reads as either "the registration process is unknown" or "the registration process does not use salted password hashes". To get from "not salted password hashes" to "salted password hashes" you need to store the password in clear text. Uggh.

If about 25 people were affected in those 10 minutes, that's only 150 per hour. Looks awfully slow. It would take 3333333 hours or 380 years to get to 500 million.

Volker Weber, 2015-03-13 23:49

In order for Verse to gain market share, it has to come roaring out of the blocks, grab market attention and share, and be demonstrably much better than whats out there. And at no point whatsoever have a security scare like this.

It's odd - the IBM I knew a few years ago did implementations like this all the time. Now this 'new' downsized and outsourced IBM doesn't even have a decent Information Assurance audit to catch schoolboy errors like this before they come down from the whiteboard.

So if IBM can't deliver complex projects in a secure, stable and repeatable way, what *can* it do? Have they really sacked *all* the good people?

---* Bill

Bill Buchan, 2015-03-14 01:23

Well, Google seems to have bigger holes these days: http://arstechnica.com/security/2015/03/epic-google-snafu-leaks-hidden-whois-data-for-280000-domains/

Richard Schwartz, 2015-03-14 07:33

IBM is joking with us. And it is not 1st of April yet. Most of the comments express surprise that IBM let something like this, but I am not. For about 2 years IBM are teasing us with this "entirely new way of work". And after all the demos, design reviews and all the talking - they delivered what?!
From my perspective this Verse preview site is something which a team of two developers can bring to life for a month. There is no surprise than that no one reviewed and tested for security issues before launch.
I do not like big software teams, but you can not launch public service like this with a team of two.

goran angelov, 2015-03-14 08:13

Repeating myself: They know how to shoot their feet...

Ingo Seifert, 2015-03-14 11:52

Did they send this notification from IBMVerse@collabserv.com, as a blind copy, with please reply to webmaster@ibmverse.com??? That's exceptional for a professional mail service.

Max Nierbauer, 2015-03-14 17:35

Maybe they can just ask some advise to the identity division?
(also this unit is not going too well and changed name several times, but there still work quite relevant people :))
http://www-03.ibm.com/software/products/en/category/identity-access-management

Giorgetto .B, 2015-03-17 09:27

Recent comments

Stefano Benassi on DNUGcomes2me at 13:10
Oliver Regelmann on Notes/Domino: Neues Leben für die Kollaborationsplattform at 22:54
Stuart McKay on DNUGcomes2me at 22:10
Hubert Stettner on Lindt :: Oh yeah at 20:20
Volker Weber on Notes/Domino: Neues Leben für die Kollaborationsplattform at 16:30
Markus Dierker on Notes/Domino: Neues Leben für die Kollaborationsplattform at 16:21
Mark Barton on DNUGcomes2me at 14:37
Lutz Haller on DNUGcomes2me at 14:08
Volker Weber on Lindt :: Oh yeah at 11:52
Andrew Magerman on Lindt :: Oh yeah at 11:02
Lars Berntrop-Bos on Lindt :: Oh yeah at 08:32
Ragnar Schierholz on Lindt :: Oh yeah at 22:42
Stephan H. Wissel on DNUGcomes2me at 17:34
Volker Weber on DNUGcomes2me at 12:05
Henning Heinz on DNUGcomes2me at 10:01
Markus Dierker on DNUGcomes2me at 08:21
Axel Koerv on #dnug45 im darmstadtium at 19:52
Volker Weber on Elgato Eve Flare :: Erste Eindrücke at 19:18
Thomas Cloer on Elgato Eve Flare :: Erste Eindrücke at 17:34
Jochen Kattoll on Sonos, AirPods, Plantronics. Und Podcasts. at 12:40
Stephan Perthes on Elgato Eve Flare :: Erste Eindrücke at 10:49
Oswald Prucker on #dnug45 im darmstadtium at 10:17
Volker Weber on #dnug45 im darmstadtium at 09:44
Ingo Spichal on #dnug45 im darmstadtium at 09:14
Hendrik Brunn on Elgato Eve Flare :: Erste Eindrücke at 23:23

Ceci n'est pas un blog

I explain difficult concepts in simple ways. For free, and for money. Clue procurement and bullshit detection.

vowe

Contact
Publications
Stuff that works
Amazon Wish List
Frequently Asked Questions

rss feed  twitter amazon

Local time is 13:34

visitors.gif

buy me coffee