Simply explained :: Do VPNs enhance your privacy?

by Volker Weber

Sketch

Ars Technica has a trending story about a research paper investigating hundreds of VPN apps for Android. This seems to be complicated but it isn't. It's all about a simple question: whom do you trust?

The sketch shows you how a VPN works. You have a network tunnel from point A to point B. This tunnel traverses a network you do not trust, like "The Internet" for instance. The tunnel has two endpoints A and B. They are supposed to be in safe territory. B could be behind your company firewall, A on your trusted device. Do you see the problem? A and B have to be trusted. If you have an app on A you cannot trust, or if you simply don't know where B is, then you are not enhancing your privacy because all of your traffic goes in and comes out at A and B. It is way easier to track you, if you always take the same road.

Comments

I use a VPN service mostly on open Hotel networks ... sure someone could start a MitM attack and also get my traffic but that is way more unlikely than someone just sniffing all open communication. But I do pay for my VPN service, that's why I trust them. And I do recognize that at B my traffic will also be very likely automatically analyzed by our three lettere friends.

Martin Hiegl, 2017-01-30 12:15

If you want to enhance security for a particular tasks it is strongly advisable that the app that has to perform that secure transaction, is also responsible to create a trustworthy encryption.

Thanks for pointing out that a VPN only helps you to mitigate an untrusted networking segment.

Dirk Bartkowiak, 2017-01-30 13:52

You're showing off, doodling on your Surface again, aren't you vowe? :)

John Ash, 2017-01-30 14:30

I wouldn't call it showing off. But you are right, that is what I use the pen for very often. I like these sketches more than Visio graphs.

Volker Weber, 2017-01-30 14:45

Post a comment

Store next two fields in a cookie for you?




Use your full name and a working email address. Unless you want your comment to be removed. No kidding.

Recent comments

Christian Henseler on A few things I learned in Munich at 20:50
Otto Foerg on A few things I learned in Munich at 18:24
Volker Weber on A few things I learned in Munich at 16:33
Ben Poole on A few things I learned in Munich at 14:29
Otto Foerg on A few things I learned in Munich at 13:11
Andrew Magerman on 15,000 Steps Is the New 10,000 at 14:13
Roland Dressler on Galaxy S8 at 10:57
Craig Wiseman on Galaxy S8 at 16:35
Alexander Koch on The most ridiculed man on the planet at 13:12
Ragnar Schierholz on Galaxy S8 at 20:21
Daniel Meyer on Week 12/2017 #dontbreakthechain at 18:31
Kai Pahl on Galaxy S8 at 16:53
Hbert Stettner on Galaxy S8 at 16:48
Oliver Regelmann on Galaxy S8 at 16:32
Christopher Schmidt on Galaxy S8 at 13:48
Richard Kaufmann on Galaxy S8 at 13:17
Axel Borschbach on 15,000 Steps Is the New 10,000 at 09:07
Daniel Kirstenpfad on 15,000 Steps Is the New 10,000 at 08:30
Lucius Bobikiewicz on The most ridiculed man on the planet at 20:39
Hbert Stettner on The most ridiculed man on the planet at 14:43
Manfred Wiktorin on The most ridiculed man on the planet at 14:15
Andreas Pfau on A few thoughts on the new Apple products announced today at 20:47
Manfred Wiktorin on A few thoughts on the new Apple products announced today at 18:12
Chris Lindley on Apple acquires Workflow at 17:20
Volker Weber on Apple acquires Workflow at 16:17

Ceci n'est pas un blog

I explain difficult concepts in simple ways. For free, and for money. Clue procurement and bullshit detection.

vowe

Contact
Publications
Amazon Wish List
Frequently Asked Questions

rss feed  twitter  instagram

Local time is 00:35

visitors.gif